Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355227›Full record

ReviewDiscover oncology2022

The diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative differentiation and delineation techniques in brain tumours.

Laura Van Hese, Steven De Vleeschouwer, Tom Theys, Steffen Rex, Ron M A Heeren, Eva Cuypers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Towards Optical Biopsy in Glioma Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura Van HeseDivision of Mass Spectrometry Imaging, Maastricht MultiModal Molecular Imaging (M4I) Institute, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Steven De VleeschouwerNeurosurgery Department, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Tom TheysNeurosurgery Department, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Steffen RexDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Ron M A HeerenDivision of Mass Spectrometry Imaging, Maastricht MultiModal Molecular Imaging (M4I) Institute, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eva CuypersDivision of Mass Spectrometry Imaging, Maastricht MultiModal Molecular Imaging (M4I) Institute, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands. e.cuypers@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USKU Leuven · BEMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S87718NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek T001919N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumour identification and delineation in a timeframe of seconds would significantly guide and support surgical decisions. Here, treatment is often complicated by the infiltration of gliomas in the surrounding brain parenchyma. Accurate delineation of the invasive margins is essential to increase the extent of resection and to avoid postoperative neurological deficits. Currently, histopathological annotation of brain biopsies and genetic phenotyping still define the first line treatment, where results become only available after surgery. Furthermore, adjuvant techniques to improve intraoperative visualisation of the tumour tissue have been developed and validated. In this review, we focused on the sensitivity and specificity of conventional techniques to characterise the tumour type and margin, specifically fluorescent-guided surgery, neuronavigation and intraoperative imaging as well as on more experimental techniques such as mass spectrometry-based diagnostics, Raman spectrometry and hyperspectral imaging. Based on our findings, all investigated methods had their advantages and limitations, guiding researchers towards the combined use of intraoperative imaging techniques. This can lead to an improved outcome in terms of extent of tumour resection and progression free survival while preserving neurological outcome of the patients.

Indexed as

Brain tumourIntraoperative characterisationLiterature reviewTumour margin delineation

Identifiers

PMID36355227
PMCPMC9649524
OpenAlexW4308770882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.