Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355216›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Identifying participants' preferences for modifiable chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy prevention clinical trial factors: an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis.

Robert Knoerl, Donna Berry, Jeffrey A Meyerhardt, Kaitlen Reyes, Elahe Salehi, Katherine Thornton, Jennifer S Gewandter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert KnoerlPhyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave LW518, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. rjknoerl@med.umich.edu.
Donna BerryBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Jeffrey A MeyerhardtMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Kaitlen ReyesMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Elahe SalehiMedical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Katherine ThorntonMedical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer S GewandterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNeurobehavioral Systems · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Promoting high-quality pain treatment trials through mentorship of junior investigators: A focus on study conduct and method developmentK24NS126861 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GEWANDTER, JENNIFER · 2021 to 2021
$306k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NINDS NIH HHS K24 NS126861NINDS NIH HHS K24NS126861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are no recommended treatments for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) prevention. Recruitment to CIPN prevention clinical trials is challenging because it is difficult to enroll patients between the time of cancer diagnosis and the initiation of neurotoxic chemotherapy. The purpose of this exploratory-sequential mixed-methods study was to determine patients' preferences that could affect the choice to participate in CIPN prevention clinical trials.

methodsFirst, twenty cognitive interviews were conducted with adults who completed less than three neurotoxic chemotherapy infusions to clarify clinical trial attributes and levels thought to be important to patients when deciding whether to enroll in CIPN prevention trials (i.e., type of treatment, clinical tests, reimbursement, survey delivery; length of visits, timing of follow-up, when to begin treatment). Second, another eighty-eight patients completed an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis survey that incorporated the finalized attributes and levels. Each level was assigned a part-worth utility score using Hierarchical Bayes Estimation. The relative importance of each attribute was calculated.

resultsThe attributes with the highest relative importance values were type of treatment (27.1%) and length of study visits (20.2%). The preferred levels included non-medicine treatment (53.49%), beginning treatment after experiencing CIPN (60.47%), email surveys (63.95%), assessments that include surveys and clinical exams (39.53%), under 30-min visits (44.19%), $50/week reimbursement (39.53%), and 1-month post-chemotherapy follow-up visits (32.56%).

conclusionsPatients' preferences for participation may be included in the design of future CIPN prevention clinical trials to potentially bolster study enrollment.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesAdultBayes TheoremHumansPatient PreferenceSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic AgentsChoice behaviorNeoplasmsPeripheral nervous system diseasesQualitative researchSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36355216
PMCPMC9648439
OpenAlexW4308685422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.