Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355214›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Clinicians' experience with topical benzydamine and morphine for the management of oral mucositis: adverse effects and barriers.

Ariel Blanchard, Noam Yarom, Lauren Levi, Karis Kin Fong Cheng, Paolo Bossi, Yehuda Zadik, Sharon Elad, Atask force of the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO)

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ariel BlanchardDivision of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. aab9028@med.cornell.edu.
Noam YaromOral Medicine Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Lauren LeviDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Orofacial Pain, Thomas Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Karis Kin Fong ChengGlobal Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Paolo BossiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health - Medical Oncology, ASST-Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Yehuda ZadikDepartment of Military Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Sharon EladOral Medicine, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Atask force of the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO)
Eastman Chemical Company (United States) · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILJefferson Hospital · USSheba Medical Center · ILThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAmong the evidence-based agents outlined in the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) mucositis guidelines, benzydamine and morphine are advised for the management of oral mucositis (OM) in certain cancer patients. This study is aimed to collect information from a group of highly experienced healthcare professionals in the field of oral mucositis about their clinical experience with these agents.

methodsA survey questionnaire about the clinical experience with topical benzydamine and morphine to manage oral mucositis and their related adverse effects (AEs) was electronically distributed to the members of the Mucositis Study Group of MASCC/ISOO.

resultsEighty-eight entries were recorded (response rate 25%), and 54 entries submitted complete questionnaires about the drug-related AE (completion rate 65%) and were used for the data analysis. Of the respondents, 44% and 27.7% prescribed benzydamine and morphine to manage their patients' oral mucositis, respectively. Lack of availability in the respondent's country was the common reason for not prescribing benzydamine and morphine (18.9% and 5.4%, respectively); however, a large portion of the respondents indicated that 'another reason' stopped them from prescribing these agents (51.3% and 73%, respectively). AEs to benzydamine or morphine were observed by 25.9% and 12.9% of respondents, respectively, with mild numbness and tingling as the most common drug-related AE for both agents.

conclusionThe use of topical benzydamine and morphine for the management of OM varies between countries. While relatively common, the AEs related to these agents are mild. Mitigating the barriers for prescribing them may increase their use.

Indexed as

BenzydamineDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMucositisNeoplasmsStomatitisHumansMorphineBenzydamineMorphineBenzydamineManagementMorphineMucositisOralPainTopical

Identifiers

PMID36355214
OpenAlexW4308681255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.