Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355212›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023

External quality assessment (EQA) for tumor mutational burden: results of an international IQN path feasibility pilot scheme.

Riziero Esposito Abate, Melanie H Cheetham, Jennifer A Fairley, Raffaella Pasquale, Alessandra Sacco, Wolstenholme Nicola, Zandra C Deans, Simon J Patton, Nicola Normanno

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Riziero Esposito AbateCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Melanie H CheethamEuropean Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN), Unit 4, Enterprise House, Pencroft Way, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6SE, UK.
Jennifer A FairleyGenQA, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Raffaella PasqualeCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Alessandra SaccoCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Wolstenholme NicolaEuropean Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN), Unit 4, Enterprise House, Pencroft Way, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6SE, UK.
Zandra C DeansGenQA, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
Simon J PattonEuropean Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN), Unit 4, Enterprise House, Pencroft Way, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, M15 6SE, UK.
Nicola NormannoCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale"-IRCCS, Naples, Italy. nicnorm@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7158-2605

Funding

Ministero della Salute GR-2018-12366829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has recently been approved as an agnostic biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, methods for TMB testing have not yet been standardized. The International Quality Network for Pathology (IQNPath) organized a pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for TMB testing. The aim of this program was the validation of the materials and the procedures for the EQA of this complex biomarker. Five formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell lines were selected to mimic the various TMB values observed in clinical practice. The FFPE samples were tested with the FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) assay as the reference test and three commercially available targeted sequencing panels. Following this internal validation, the five cell lines were sent to 29 laboratories selected on the basis of a previous survey. Nineteen of the 23 laboratories that submitted results (82.6%) used targeted sequencing for TMB estimation. Only two laboratories performed whole exome sequencing (WES) and two assessed TMB by clinical exome. A high variability in the reported TMB values was observed. The variability was higher for samples with the highest TMB value according to the F1CDx test. However, good reproducibility of the TMB score was shown by laboratories using the same panel. The majority of laboratories did not indicate a TMB cut-off value for clinical interpretation. In conclusion, this pilot EQA scheme suggests that it is feasible to run such an EQA program for TMB assessment. However, the results of our pilot highlight the numerous challenges for the standardization of this test.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorNeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansMutationReproducibility of ResultsTumor BurdenBiomarkers, TumorExternal quality assessmentPredictive biomarkersTMB testingTumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID36355212
PMCPMC9931778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.