ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Deep learning-based harmonization of CT reconstruction kernels towards improved clinical task performance.
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of slice thickness on quantitative analysis of interstitial lung disease: a retrospective volumetric chest CT study.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Radiomic Analysis of Striatal [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Impact of harmonization and oversampling methods on radiomics analysis of multi-center imbalanced datasets: application to PET-based prediction of lung cancer subtypes.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- The Role of Harmonization: A Systematic Analysis of Various Task-based Scenarios.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Can CT Image Reconstruction Parameters Impact the Predictive Value of Radiomics Features in Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Lung CT harmonization of paired reconstruction kernel images using generative adversarial networks.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Inter-vendor harmonization of CT reconstruction kernels using unpaired image translation.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a deep learning-based harmonization framework, assessing whether it can improve performance of radiomics models given different kernels in different clinical tasks and additionally generalize to mitigate the effects of new/unobserved kernels on radiomics features.
methodsPatient data with 2 reconstruction kernels and phantom data with 22 reconstruction kernels were included. Eighty-five patients were studied for lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction, and 164 patients for differential diagnosis between lung cancer (LC) and pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Two convolutional neural network (CNN) models were developed to convert images (i) from B70f to B30f (CNNa) and (ii) from B30f to B70f (CNNb). Model performance between the two kernels was evaluated using AUC and compared with other well-known harmonization methods. Patient-normalized feature difference (PNFD) was used to identify the incompatible kernels (i.e., kernel with median PNFD > 1) with baseline (B30f/B70f), and measure the ability of the CNN models to convert the non-comparable kernels.
resultsFor LC versus pulmonary TB diagnosis, AUCs of CNNa vs. others were 0.85 vs. 0.54-0.74 (p = 0.0001-0.0003), and for CNNb vs. others: 0.87 vs. 0.54-0.86 (p = 0.0001-0.55). For LNM prediction, AUCs of CNNa vs. others were 0.68 vs. 0.56-0.61 (p = 0.10-0.39), and for CNNb vs. others: 0.78 vs. 0.70-0.73 (p = 0.07-0.40). After CNN harmonization, 17 of 20 (85%) of investigated unknown kernels produced comparable radiomics feature values relative to baseline (median PNFD from 1.10-2.31 to 0.23-1.13).
conclusionThe CNN harmonization effectively improved performance of radiomics models between reconstruction kernels in different clinical tasks, and reduced feature differences between unknown kernels vs. baseline. KEY POINTS: • The soft (B30f) and sharp (B70f) kernels strongly affect radiomics reproducibility and generalizability. • The convolutional neural network (CNN) harmonization methods performed better than location-scale (ComBat and centering-scaling) and matrix factorization harmonization methods (based on singular value decomposition (SVD) and independent component analysis (ICA)) in both clinical tasks. • The CNN harmonization methods improve feature reproducibility not only between specific kernels (B30f and B70f) from the same scanner, but also between unobserved kernels from different scanners of different vendors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36355196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.