ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Pediatric
Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research and predictive analysis of the disease burden of bloodstream infectious diseases in China.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Bloodstream infections: mechanisms of pathogenesis and opportunities for intervention.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric bloodstream infections and alteration in antimicrobial resistance phenotypes in Gram-positive bacteria, 2020-2022.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Clinical, Epidemiological and Laboratory Features of InvasiveJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- InvasiveMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Novel evidence on sepsis-inducing pathogens: from laboratory to bedside.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatricians face a therapeutic challenge when patients with Candida bloodstream infections (BSIs) simultaneously have positive bacterial culture. We aim to characterize the clinical characteristics of pediatric Candida BSIs complicated with mixed bacteremia and subsequent bacterial infections, risk factors and impacts on outcomes. Methods: All episodes of pediatric Candida BSIs between 2005 and 2020 from a medical center in Taiwan were reviewed. Mixed Candida/bacterial BSIs were defined as isolation of a bacterial pathogen from blood cultures obtained within 48 h before or after the onset of Candida BSI. The clinical features and impacts of mixed Candida/bacterial BSIs were investigated. Results: During the study period, 320 patients with a total of 365 episodes of Candida BSIs were identified and analyzed. Mixed Candida/bacterial BSIs were 35 episodes (9.6%). No significant difference was found between mixed Candida/bacterial BSIs and monomicrobial Candida BSIs in terms of patient demographics, Candida species distributions, most chronic comorbidities or risk factors. Patients with mixed Candida/bacterial BSIs were associated with a significantly higher risk of subsequent bacteremia (51.4% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001) and a relatively higher candidemia-attributable mortality rate (37.2% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.061) than those with monomicrobial Candida BSIs. Mixed Candida/bacterial BSIs were not an independent risk factor of treatment failure or final mortality according to multivariate logistic regression analyses. Conclusions: The clinical significance of mixed Candida/bacterial BSIs in children included a longer duration of septic symptoms, significantly higher likelihood to have subsequent bacteremia, and relatively higher risk of candidemia attributable mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.