ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022
The Athlete's Heart and Machine Learning: A Review of Current Implementations and Gaps for Future Research.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Athleticism and Sports Profiles Throughout Machine Learning Applied to Heart Rate Variability.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Preparticipation Cardiovascular Screening of Athletes: Current Controversies and Challenges for the Future.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Role of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Diagnosis of Athlete's Heart: Navigating the Shades of Grey.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Sports Medicine: Reshaping Electrocardiogram Analysis for Athlete Safety-A Narrative Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Analyzing ECG signals in professional football players using machine learning techniques.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Performance and healthcare analysis in elite sports teams using artificial intelligence: a scoping review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence to Detect Cardiac Rhythm Disturbances in Athletes: A Scoping Review.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntense training exercise regimes cause physiological changes within the heart to help cope with the increased stress, known as the "athlete's heart". These changes can mask pathological changes, making them harder to diagnose and increasing the risk of an adverse cardiac outcome.
aimThis paper reviews which machine learning techniques (ML) are being used within athlete's heart research and how they are being implemented, as well as assesses the uptake of these techniques within this area of research.
methodsSearches were carried out on the Scopus and PubMed online datasets and a scoping review was conducted on the studies which were identified.
resultsTwenty-eight studies were included within the review, with ML being directly referenced within 16 (57%). A total of 12 different techniques were used, with the most popular being artificial neural networks and the most common implementation being to perform classification tasks. The review also highlighted the subgroups of interest: predictive modelling, reviews, and wearables, with most of the studies being attributed to the predictive modelling subgroup. The most common type of data used was the electrocardiogram (ECG), with echocardiograms being used the second most often.
conclusionThe results show that over the last 11 years, there has been a growing desire of leveraging ML techniques to help further the understanding of the athlete's heart, whether it be by expanding the knowledge of the physiological changes or by improving the accuracies of models to help improve the treatments and disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.