Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36354681›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2022

OMICS in Fodder Crops: Applications, Challenges, and Prospects.

Pawan Kumar, Jagmohan Singh, Gurleen Kaur, Paul Motunrayo Adunola, Anju Biswas, Sumandeep Bazzer, Harpreet Kaur, Ishveen Kaur, Harpreet Kaur, Karansher Singh Sandhu and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cowpea Constraints and Breeding in Europe.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pawan KumarAgrotechnology Division, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur 176061, India.
Jagmohan SinghDivision of Plant Pathology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-0106
Gurleen KaurHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Paul Motunrayo AdunolaHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Anju BiswasAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Sumandeep BazzerDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, WA 57007, USA.
Harpreet KaurDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88001, USA.
Ishveen KaurDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Harpreet KaurDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN 37209, USA.
Karansher Singh SandhuDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-2646
Shailaja VemulaAgronomy Department, UF/IFAS Research and Education Center, Belle Glade, FL 33430, USA.
Balwinder KaurDepartment of Entomology, UF/IFAS Research and Education Center, Belle Glade, FL 33430, USA.
Varsha SinghDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA.
Te Ming TsengDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8102-8149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomass yield and quality are the primary targets in forage crop improvement programs worldwide. Low-quality fodder reduces the quality of dairy products and affects cattle's health. In multipurpose crops, such as maize, sorghum, cowpea, alfalfa, and oat, a plethora of morphological and biochemical/nutritional quality studies have been conducted. However, the overall growth in fodder quality improvement is not on par with cereals or major food crops. The use of advanced technologies, such as multi-omics, has increased crop improvement programs manyfold. Traits such as stay-green, the number of tillers per plant, total biomass, and tolerance to biotic and/or abiotic stresses can be targeted in fodder crop improvement programs. Omic technologies, namely genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and phenomics, provide an efficient way to develop better cultivars. There is an abundance of scope for fodder quality improvement by improving the forage nutrition quality, edible quality, and digestibility. The present review includes a brief description of the established omics technologies for five major fodder crops, i.e., sorghum, cowpea, maize, oats, and alfalfa. Additionally, current improvements and future perspectives have been highlighted.

Indexed as

alfalfacowpeagenomicsmaizemetabolomicsoatsphenomicsproteomicssorghumtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID36354681
PMCPMC9688858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.