Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36354595›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Development of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Bilosomes In-Situ Gel for Ocular Delivery: Optimization, In-Vitro Characterization, Ex-Vivo Permeation, and Antimicrobial Study.

Omar Awad Alsaidan, Ameeduzzafar Zafar, Mohd Yasir, Sami I Alzarea, Mohammed Alqinyah, Mohammad Khalid

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Lipid Microspheres for Topical Delivery of Norfloxacin: Development and Evaluation.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of Gentamicin Bilosomes LadenAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Omar Awad AlsaidanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2848-2932
Ameeduzzafar ZafarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0181-0278
Mohd YasirDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Arsi University, Asella 396, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-9742-1482
Sami I AlzareaDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4007-4023
Mohammed AlqinyahDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad KhalidDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Jouf University · SAAsossa University · ETKing Saud University · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

Al Jouf University DSR-2021-01-0398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional eye drops are most commonly employed topically in the eye for the management of bacterial conjunctivitis. Eye drops have a low corneal residence time and 90−95% of the administered dose is eliminated from the eye by blinking and the nasolacrimal drainage system. This problem can be minimized by formulating a mucoadhesive ocular in-situ gel system that undergoes sol-gel transition upon stimulation by temperature, pH, and ions. The goal of this study was to develop ciprofloxacin (CIP) loaded bilosomes (BLO) in-situ gel for the improvement of therapeutic efficacy. The BLO was prepared by the thin-film hydration method and optimized by the Box−Behnken design. Cholesterol (CHO), surfactant (Span 60), and bile salt (sodium deoxycholate/SDC) were used as formulation factors. The vesicle size (nm) and entrapment efficiency (%) were selected as responses (dependent factors). The optimized CIP-BLO (CIP-BLO-opt) formulation displayed a vesicle size of 182.4 ± 9.2 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.274, a zeta potential of −34,461.51 mV, and an entrapment efficiency of 90.14 ± 1.24%. Both x-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry spectra did not exhibit extensive peaks of CIP in CIP-BLO-opt, revealing that CIP is encapsulated in the BLO matrix. The CIP-BLO-opt formulation was successfully incorporated into an in-situ gel system using a gelling agent, i.e., Carbopol 934P and hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC K100 M). CIP-BLO-opt in-situ gel formulation (CIP-BLO-opt-IG3) was evaluated for gelling capacity, clarity, pH, viscosity, in-vitro CIP release, bio-adhesive, ex-vivo permeation, toxicity, and antimicrobial study. The CIP-BLO-opt-IG3 exhibited satisfactory gelling properties with a viscosity of 145.85 ± 9.48 cP in the gelling state. CIP-BLO-opt-IG3 displayed sustained CIP release (83.87 ± 5.24%) with Korsmeyer−Peppas kinetic as a best-fitted model (R2 = 0.9667). CIP-BLO-opt-IG3 exhibited a 1.16-fold than CIP-IG and a 2.08-fold higher permeability than pure CIP. CIP-BLO-opt-IG3 displayed a significantly greater bio-adhesion property (924.52 ± 12.37 dyne/cm2) than tear film. Further, CIP-BLO-opt-IG3 does not display any toxicity as confirmed by corneal hydration (76.15%), histology, and the HET-CAM test (zero scores). CIP-BLO-opt-IG3 shows significantly higher (p < 0.05) antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus than pure CIP. From all these findings, it could be concluded that CIP-BLO-opt-IG3 might be an effective strategy for the increment of corneal residence time and therapeutic activity of CIP.

Indexed as

antimicrobialbilosomesciprofloxacinHET-CAMin-situ gelocular delivery

Identifiers

PMID36354595
PMCPMC9688993
OpenAlexW4307550712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.