ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022
PHF
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease endoscopy - a review of current evidence and a critical perspective on future challenges.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Machine Learning for Biomedical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating the severity of ulcerative colitis (UC) through the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is crucial for understanding patient conditions and providing effective treatment. However, UC lesions present different characteristics in endoscopic images, exacerbating interclass similarities and intraclass differences in MES classification. In addition, inexperience and review fatigue in endoscopists introduces nontrivial challenges to the reliability and repeatability of MES evaluations. In this paper, we propose a pyramid hybrid feature fusion framework (PHF3) as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for clinical UC severity classification. Specifically, the PHF3 model has a dual-branch hybrid architecture with ResNet50 and a pyramid vision Transformer (PvT), where the local features extracted by ResNet50 represent the relationship between the intestinal wall at the near-shot point and its depth, and the global representations modeled by the PvT capture similar information in the cross-section of the intestinal cavity. Furthermore, a feature fusion module (FFM) is designed to combine local features with global representations, while second-order pooling (SOP) is applied to enhance discriminative information in the classification process. The experimental results show that, compared with existing methods, the proposed PHF3 model has competitive performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of MES 0, MES 1, MES 2, and MES 3 reached 0.996, 0.972, 0.967, and 0.990, respectively, and the overall accuracy reached 88.91%. Thus, our proposed method is valuable for developing an auxiliary assessment system for UC severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.