Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36354508›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2022

Impact of Scala Tympani Geometry on Insertion Forces during Implantation.

Filip Hrncirik, Iwan V Roberts, Chloe Swords, Peter J Christopher, Akil Chhabu, Andrew H Gee, Manohar L Bance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preclinical evaluation of a tool for insertion force measurements in cochlear implant surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Filip HrncirikCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.
Iwan V RobertsCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0826-4142
Chloe SwordsCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0431-4491
Peter J ChristopherDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4034-2147
Akil ChhabuClinical School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK.
Andrew H GeeDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8467-3023
Manohar L BanceCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209749/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust RG93172/BANCE/40181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: During a cochlear implant insertion, the mechanical trauma can cause residual hearing loss in up to half of implantations. The forces on the cochlea during the insertion can lead to this mechanical trauma but can be highly variable between subjects which is thought to be due to differing anatomy, namely of the scala tympani. This study presents a systematic investigation of the influence of different geometrical parameters of the scala tympani on the cochlear implant insertion force. The influence of these parameters on the insertion forces were determined by testing the forces within 3D-printed, optically transparent models of the scala tympani with geometric alterations. (2) Methods: Three-dimensional segmentations of the cochlea were characterised using a custom MATLAB script which parametrised the scala tympani model, procedurally altered the key shape parameters (e.g., the volume, vertical trajectory, curvature, and cross-sectional area), and generated 3D printable models that were printed using a digital light processing 3D printer. The printed models were then attached to a custom insertion setup that measured the insertion forces on the cochlear implant and the scala tympani model during a controlled robotic insertion. (3) Results: It was determined that the insertion force is largely unaffected by the overall size, curvature, vertical trajectory, and cross-sectional area once the forces were normalised to an angular insertion depth. A Capstan-based model of the CI insertion forces was developed and matched well to the data acquired. (4) Conclusion: By using accurate 3D-printed models of the scala tympani with geometrical alterations, it was possible to demonstrate the insensitivity of the insertion forces to the size and shape of the scala tympani, after controlling for the angular insertion depth. This supports the Capstan model of the cochlear implant insertion force which predicts an exponential growth of the frictional force with an angular insertion depth. This concludes that the angular insertion depth, rather than the length of the CI inserted, should be the major consideration when evaluating the insertion force and associated mechanical trauma caused by cochlear implant insertion.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCochleaHumansMechanical PhenomenaScala Tympani3D printingcochlear implantinsertion forcesmicro-CTscala tympani

Identifiers

PMID36354508
PMCPMC9688204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.