ReviewBiosensors2022
Micro-/Nano-Structured Biodegradable Pressure Sensors for Biomedical Applications.
Review in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motion-driven piezoelectric response in self-powered hydrogel nanofibers enhances wound healing via intermediate filament remodeling and modulation of energy metabolism.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Computational modeling of stent failure during crimping and deployment in coronary arteries.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- Analysis of Tribological and Cytotoxicity Assays of a Biocompatible Mg-Zn-Ca-Pr Alloy.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Catheter-Free Urodynamics Testing: Current Insights and Clinical Potential.Research and reports in urology · 2024Review
- A Review of Single-Cell Microrobots: Classification, Driving Methods and Applications.Micromachines · 2023Review
- MXene-Based Nanocomposites for Piezoelectric and Triboelectric Energy Harvesting Applications.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Zinc hybrid sintering for printed transient sensors and wireless electronics.Npj flexible electronics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interest in biodegradable pressure sensors in the biomedical field is growing because of their temporary existence in wearable and implantable applications without any biocompatibility issues. In contrast to the limited sensing performance and biocompatibility of initially developed biodegradable pressure sensors, device performances and functionalities have drastically improved owing to the recent developments in micro-/nano-technologies including device structures and materials. Thus, there is greater possibility of their use in diagnosis and healthcare applications. This review article summarizes the recent advances in micro-/nano-structured biodegradable pressure sensor devices. In particular, we focus on the considerable improvement in performance and functionality at the device-level that has been achieved by adapting the geometrical design parameters in the micro- and nano-meter range. First, the material choices and sensing mechanisms available for fabricating micro-/nano-structured biodegradable pressure sensor devices are discussed. Then, this is followed by a historical development in the biodegradable pressure sensors. In particular, we highlight not only the fabrication methods and performances of the sensor device, but also their biocompatibility. Finally, we intoduce the recent examples of the micro/nano-structured biodegradable pressure sensor for biomedical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.