ArticleMedical physics2023
Explainability and controllability of patient-specific deep learning with attention-based augmentation for markerless image-guided radiotherapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recent advances in applying machine learning to proton radiotherapy.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2025Pooled it
- Fluoroscopy-Guided Motion Management in Particle Therapy: Evolution, Challenges, and AI-Enabled Opportunities.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Multi-Patient Vision Transformer for Markerless Tumor Motion Forecasting.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Feasibility of markerless real-time tumor tracking volumetric modulated arc therapy using diaphragm-based respiratory offset vectors.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Marker-Less Lung Tumor Tracking from Real-Time Color X-Ray Fluoroscopic Images Using Cross-Patient Deep Learning Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characterization of secondary-radiation background in X-ray flat-panel detectors during scanning proton beam irradiation.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Patient-specific deep learning tracking for real-time 2D pancreas localisation in kV-guided radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based target decomposition for markerless lung tumor tracking in radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based target tracking with X-ray images for radiotherapy: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Explainability and controllability of patient-specific deep learning with attention-based augmentation for markerless image-guided radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Uncertain Feature-refinement Attention Unet: Considering Suitable Convolutional Neural Network Model for Real-time Segmentation in Markerless Tumor Tracking.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe reported the concept of patient-specific deep learning (DL) for real-time markerless tumor segmentation in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The method was aimed to control the attention of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) by artificial differences in co-occurrence probability (CoOCP) in training datasets, that is, focusing CNN attention on soft tissues while ignoring bones. However, the effectiveness of this attention-based data augmentation has not been confirmed by explainable techniques. Furthermore, compared to reasonable ground truths, the feasibility of tumor segmentation in clinical kilovolt (kV) X-ray fluoroscopic (XF) images has not been confirmed. PURPOSE: The first aim of this paper was to present evidence that the proposed method provides an explanation and control of DL behavior. The second purpose was to validate the real-time lung tumor segmentation in clinical kV XF images for IGRT.
methodsThis retrospective study included 10 patients with lung cancer. Patient-specific and XF angle-specific image pairs comprising digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and projected-clinical-target-volume (pCTV) images were calculated from four-dimensional computer tomographic data and treatment planning information. The training datasets were primarily augmented by random overlay (RO) and noise injection (NI): RO aims to differentiate positional CoOCP in soft tissues and bones, and NI aims to make a difference in the frequency of occurrence of local and global image features. The CNNs for each patient-and-angle were automatically optimized in the DL training stage to transform the training DRRs into pCTV images. In the inference stage, the trained CNNs transformed the test XF images into pCTV images, thus identifying target positions and shapes.
resultsThe visual analysis of DL attention heatmaps for a test image demonstrated that our method focused CNN attention on soft tissue and global image features rather than bones and local features. The processing time for each patient-and-angle-specific dataset in the training stage was ∼30 min, whereas that in the inference stage was 8 ms/frame. The estimated three-dimensional 95 percentile tracking error, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance for 10 patients were 1.3-3.9 mm, 0.85-0.94, and 0.6-4.9 mm, respectively.
conclusionsThe proposed attention-based data augmentation with both RO and NI made the CNN behavior more explainable and more controllable. The results obtained demonstrated the feasibility of real-time markerless lung tumor segmentation in kV XF images for IGRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.