Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353722›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine international2022

Diagnostic Accuracy Rates of Appendicitis Scoring Systems for the Stratified Age Groups.

Emre Gonullu, Zulfu Bayhan, Recayi Capoglu, Barış Mantoglu, Burak Kamburoglu, Tarık Harmantepe, Fatih Altıntoprak, Unal Erkorkmaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A hybrid machine learning approach to improve the diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emre GonulluSakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-4414
Zulfu BayhanSakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7587-7267
Recayi CapogluSakarya University, Training and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4438-4301
Barış MantogluSakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2161-3629
Burak KamburogluSakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2242-5723
Tarık HarmantepeSakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-7646
Fatih AltıntoprakSakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3939-8293
Unal ErkorkmazSakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-4704
Sakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many scoring systems have been developed for acute appendicitis, which is the most common emergent disorder in surgical practice. Considering the physiological changes and chronic diseases occurring with advancing age, an applied scoring system may not produce the same score in similar patients in all age groups. Objectives: We aimed to compare the predictive values of scoring systems in different age groups. Methods: In this prospective study, the patients operated on in our clinic with a prediagnosis of acute appendicitis between March 2020 and March 2021 were included. We divided them into three age groups as 18-45 years (group 1), 46-65 years (group 2), and >65 years (group 3). We compared the scores of the nine acute appendicitis scoring systems most commonly used in the literature for these age groups. Results: A total of 203 patients were included in our study. The Alvarado scoring system yielded the most accurate results for group 1, whereas the Fenyo-Linberg scoring system was the most accurate system for group 2 and the Eskelinen scoring system for group 3. Conclusion: Age should be considered as a major parameter during the selection of the scoring system to be applied for patients with prediagnosis of acute appendicitis. Our study revealed the Alvarado and the Fenyo-Lindberg scoring systems as the most accurate systems for the differential diagnosis of appendicitis in the 18-45 and 46-65 years age groups, respectively. Although we found the Eskelinen scoring system as the most accurate one in the >65 years age group, the confidence intervals indicated that it may not be appropriate for use alone in this group.

Identifiers

PMID36353722
PMCPMC9640239
OpenAlexW4307855373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.