Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353693›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Effect of health literacy and shared decision-making on choice of weight-loss plan among overweight or obese participants receiving a prototype artificial intelligence robot intervention facilitating weight-loss management decisions.

Yi-Tang Chu, Ru-Yi Huang, Tara Tai-Wen Chen, Wei-Hsuan Lin, James TaoQian Tang, Chi-Wei Lin, Chi-Hsien Huang, Chung-Ying Lin, Jung-Sheng Chen, Sabrina Kurtz-Rossi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yi-Tang ChuDepartment of Holistic Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-3742
Ru-Yi HuangDepartment of Holistic Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6867-7171
Tara Tai-Wen ChenDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wei-Hsuan LinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1526-3749
James TaoQian TangDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5007-6992
Chi-Wei LinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chi-Hsien HuangDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chung-Ying LinInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jung-Sheng ChenDepartment of Medical Research, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Sabrina Kurtz-RossiDepartment of Public Health & Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Kristine SørensenGlobal Health Literacy Academy, Risskov, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical decision-making is still in early development. We developed an AI robot intervention prototype with a health literacy-friendly interface that uses interactive voice response (IVR) surveying to assist in decision-making for weight loss. The weight-specific health literacy instrument (WSHLI) and Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDMQ) were used to measure factors influencing weight-loss decisions. Factors associated with participants choosing to lose weight were analyzed using logistic regression, and factors influencing the selection of specific weight-loss plans were examined with one-way analysis of variance. Our study recruited 144 overweight or obese adults (69.4% women, 58.3% with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24). After interacting with the AI robot, 78% of the study population made the decision to lose weight. SDMQ score was a significant factor positively influencing the decision for weight-loss (odds ratio [OR]: 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-4.29,

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence robothealth literacyshared decision-makingweight-loss plan

Identifiers

PMID36353693
PMCPMC9638535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.