Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353663›Full record

ArticleJournal of migration and health2022

The United States detention system for migrants: Patterns of negligence and inconsistency.

David Tellez, Lauren Tejkl, Dana McLaughlin, Maryada Vallet, Orit Abrahim, Paul B Spiegel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of migration and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David TellezCenter for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E8541, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Lauren TejklCenter for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E8541, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Dana McLaughlinCenter for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E8541, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Maryada ValletCenter for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E8541, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Orit AbrahimCenter for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E8541, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Paul B SpiegelCenter for Humanitarian Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E8541, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States of America (US) detains more migrants than any other nation. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detain adults and families under the Department of Homeland Security, while unaccompanied minors are housed under the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) within the Department of Health and Human Services. Migrants are subject to the standards and oversight of each individual agency and facility where they are detained. This paper presents an analysis of whether the current US migrant detention system upholds the standards of each agency to maintain the health of migrants. A review of peer and grey literature, along with interviews with key informants (KI) who had worked in or visited ICE, CBP, or ORR facilities since January 2018 were undertaken. Analysis of the literature review and KI interviews covered five thematic areas: health, protection of vulnerable populations, shelter, food and nutrition, and hygiene. Thirty-nine peer-reviewed publications and 28 US Office of Inspector General reports from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. Seventeen KI interviews were conducted. Though all three detention agencies had significant areas of concern, CBP's inability to abide by its health standards was particularly alarming. The persistence of low compliance with standards stemmed from weak accountability mechanisms, minimal transparency, and inadequate capacity to provide essential services. We have five recommendations: (1) expand independent monitoring and evaluation mechanisms; (2) standardize health standards across the three agencies; (3) develop a systematic evaluation tool to help external visitors, including members of Congress, assess the degree of implementation of standards; (4) enforce consequences for private contractors who violate standards; and (5) restrict the use of waivers that allow detention facilities to circumvent compliance with standards. Ultimately, the US federal government should explore and implement alternatives to detention to maintain the health and dignity of the individuals under its care.

Indexed as

Detention, AsylumHuman rightsMigrationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36353663
PMCPMC9637916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.