Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353610›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases and gliomas.

Eric J Lehrer, Roman O Kowalchuk, Henry Ruiz-Garcia, Kenneth W Merrell, Paul D Brown, Joshua D Palmer, Stuart H Burri, Jason P Sheehan, Alfredo Quninoes-Hinojosa, Daniel M Trifiletti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. DEGRO guideline for personalized radiotherapy of brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Eric J LehrerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Roman O KowalchukDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Henry Ruiz-GarciaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Kenneth W MerrellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Joshua D PalmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Stuart H BurriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.
Jason P SheehanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Alfredo Quninoes-HinojosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Daniel M TrifilettiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USAtrium Medical Cente · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNeurological Surgery · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the delivery of a high dose ionizing radiation in a highly conformal manner, which allows for significant sparing of nearby healthy tissues. It is typically delivered in 1-5 sessions and has demonstrated safety and efficacy across multiple intracranial neoplasms and functional disorders. In the setting of brain metastases, postoperative and definitive SRS has demonstrated favorable rates of tumor control and improved cognitive preservation compared to conventional whole brain radiation therapy. However, the risk of local failure and treatment-related complications (e.g. radiation necrosis) markedly increases with larger postoperative treatment volumes. Additionally, the risk of leptomeningeal disease is significantly higher in patients treated with postoperative SRS. In the setting of high grade glioma, preclinical reports have suggested that preoperative SRS may enhance anti-tumor immunity as compared to postoperative radiotherapy. In addition to potentially permitting smaller target volumes, tissue analysis may permit characterization of DNA repair pathways and tumor microenvironment changes in response to SRS, which may be used to further tailor therapy and identify novel therapeutic targets. Building on the work from preoperative SRS for brain metastases and preclinical work for high grade gliomas, further exploration of this treatment paradigm in the latter is warranted. Presently, there are prospective early phase clinical trials underway investigating the role of preoperative SRS in the management of high grade gliomas. In the forthcoming sections, we review the biologic rationale for preoperative SRS, as well as pertinent preclinical and clinical data, including ongoing and planned prospective clinical trials.

Indexed as

brain metastasesgliomaneurosurgeryradiation oncologystereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID36353610
PMCPMC9637863
OpenAlexW4307274080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.