Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353588›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2022

Hybrid breast augmentation: our surgical approach and formula for preoperative assessment of fat graft volume.

Emilio Trignano, Pietro Luciano Serra, Nicola Pili, Claudia Trignano, Corrado Rubino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhancing Cleavage Aesthetics in Patients Seeking Breast Augmentation: Surgical Technique and Key Considerations.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emilio TrignanoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Pietro Luciano SerraDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Nicola PiliDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Claudia TrignanoDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Università di Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Corrado RubinoDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, Sassari University Hospital Trust, Plastic Surgery Unit, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autogenous fat grafting (AFG) is a well-known procedure utilized in addition to breast augmentation (BA) to improve breast appearance. Plastic surgeons usually estimate the ideal AFG volume relying on their personal experience based on similar previous cases: inaccurate predictions could result in incorrect evaluation of donor sites and even needless fat transfer. The purpose of this paper is to describe and prove the validity of our surgical technique and provide a simple and easy-to-use mathematical formula to assess the adequate proportion, between the volume of the implants and of the AFG, in order to obtain a natural shape and a proper volume in BA. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two patients (244 breasts) were subjected to primary/secondary hybrid BA (HBA). A formula was utilized to assess the volume of fat graft. Data about their age, body mass index (BMI), incision and implants were collected. Follow-up for analysis was fixed at less than 15 days, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months for analysis. Preoperative photographs were compared with postoperative at 12 months. Pre and postoperative Breast-Q Results: All patients received Ergonomix-style Motiva Smooth/SilkSurface with low/high projection (range, 120-225 mL, mean 170 mL) and an average AFG volume of 600 mL (range, 480-720 mL). Breast-Q Conclusions: Our surgical technique proves low complication rate and short recovery times. Our mathematical formula to calculate the AFG seems to be both predictive and a precise guide for surgical decision-making in planning the treatment of patients candidated for HBA. In fact, the analysis of Breast-Q

Indexed as

aestheticfat graftHybrid breast augmentation (HBA)

Identifiers

PMID36353588
PMCPMC9638795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.