ArticleGland surgery2022
The analysis and validation of the prediction value of conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nomogram model based on ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT for predicting BRAFFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Ultrasound features as predictive markers ofGland surgery · 2024Article
- Anti-EGFR/BRAF-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Thyroid Carcinoma.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: We consecutively and retrospectively enrolled patients with PTMC who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) at our hospital between January 2020 and January 2021. All PTMC patients received conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound prior to FNAB, samples gained went through cytological analysis and BRAF testing subsequently. The following conventional ultrasonography data were analyzed: maximum diameter, echogenicity, echo homogeneity, echogenic foci, location, shape, boundary, aspect ratio, and blood flow volume. Moreover, the following contrast-enhanced ultrasonography data were also analyzed: degree, homogeneity, completeness, and enhancement method. Time-intensity curves from contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were analyzed using VueBox software for different regions of interest, including the entire tumor, the area of strongest enhancement, and healthy thyroid glands. The independent risk factors for Results: Of the 103 PTMC lesions analyzed, 72 involved Conclusions: Conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics, including relative time to peak value in the area of strongest enhancement, unclear boundary, location adjacent to thyroid capsules, maximum diameter >0.5 cm, and punctate echogenic foci, may be useful for predicting
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.