ArticleGland surgery2022
Combined targeting of KRT23 and NCCRP1 as a potential novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiomics, pharmacogenomic, and structural characterization of NCCRP1 as a candidate therapeutic target in ovarian cancer.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- The phosphoproteome of ovarian carcinoma delineates signaling signatures and potentially druggable targets across histotype stages.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- DNA hypermethylation of nonspecific cytotoxic cell receptor protein 1 and poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- KRT23 promotes proliferation invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer through epithelial-mesenchymal transition mediated by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- ZNF384 mediates KRT23 to promote CRC process through the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway.Cytotechnology · 2025Article
- Cytokeratin expression in breast cancer: from mechanisms, progression, diagnosis, and prognosis to therapeutic implications.Molecular & cellular oncology · 2025Review
- Oncogene activated human breast luminal progenitors contribute basally located myoepithelial cells.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Immune checkpoint gene signature assesses immune infiltration profiles in bladder cancer and identifies KRT23 as an immunotherapeutic target.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- A promising anoikis-related prognostic signature predicts prognosis of skin cutaneous melanoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- A risk signature based on endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated genes predicts prognosis and immunity in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Construction and validation of predictive model based on endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes for triple-negative breast cancer.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancers characterized by triple-negative status tend to be more malignant and have a poorer prognosis. A risk model for predicting breast cancer risk should be developed. Methods: We obtained gene expression and clinical characteristics data using the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differential gene screening between patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-triple-negative breast cancers (NTNBC) was performed according to the "edgeR" filter criteria. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to construct a risk model and identify prognosis-related genes. XCELL, TIMER, EPIC, QUANTISEQ, MCPCOUNTER, EPIC, CIBERSORT-ABS, and CIBERSORT software programs were used to determine the extent of tumor immune cell infiltration. To evaluate the clinical responses to breast cancer treatment, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50s) of common chemotherapeutics were calculated using "pRRophetic" and "ggplot2". Cell proliferation was assayed using cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) and 5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) Cell Proliferation Kit. A dual-luciferase reporter assay confirmed the gene regulatory relationship of sex determining region Y-box 10 (SOX10). Results: An assessment model was established for Keratin23 (KRT23) and non-specific cytotoxic cell receptor 1 (NCCRP1) using the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. In addition, high expression levels of KRT23 and NCCRP1 indicated high proliferation and poor prognosis. We also found that the gene expression patterns of multiple genes were significantly more predictive of risks and have a higher level of consistency when assessing risk. Conclusions: In conclusion, we constructed a risk assessment model to predict the risk of TNBC patients, which acted as a potential predictor for chemosensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.