ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Development and validation of a population-based prognostic nomogram for primary colorectal lymphoma patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-driven dynamic prognosis for primary colorectal lymphoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of web-based risk score predicting prognostic nomograms for elderly patients with primary colorectal lymphoma: A population-based study.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2024Article
- A Novel Age-Based Nomogram as the Best Predictor for Long-Term Overall Survival in Head and Neck Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary colorectal lymphoma (PCL) is a relatively rare cancer type, constituting 15%-20% of primary gastrointestinal lymphoma and <1% of all colorectal malignancies. Given its low incidence, standard guidelines for case management are not available. This large population-based study aims to construct a nomogram to predict survival outcomes and to help tailor individualised treatment decisions in patients with PCL. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with PCL was developed using data registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1990 and 2015. The prognostic nomogram was constructed using R software after univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Cox regression models were assessed using the proportional hazards (PH) assumption. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to analyze survival outcomes. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year area under the curve (AUC) values of ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves, the concordance index (C-index), and calibration curves were calculated to verify the predictive performance of the nomogram. Results: The final nomogram included age, Ann Arbor stage, histology, location, marital status, and treatment, all of which had an important effect on overall survival (OS). The discrimination of the nomogram revealed good prognostic accuracy and clinical applicability as indicated by C-index values of 0.713 and 0.711 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly different for distinct conditions. Conclusion: This study developed and validated a six-factor nomogram for predicting PCL patient prognosis. This nomogram might be useful for risk stratification and making better individualised decisions for PCL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.