Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

A domain knowledge enhanced yield based deep learning classifier identifies perineural invasion in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Li-Yu Lee, Cheng-Han Yang, Yu-Chieh Lin, Yu-Han Hsieh, Yung-An Chen, Margaret Dah-Tsyr Chang, Yen-Yin Lin, Chun-Ta Liao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Reconceiving Perineural Invasion in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Biological to Histopathological Assessment.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li-Yu LeeDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Cheng-Han YangDepartment of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yu-Chieh LinDepartment of Strategic Technology, JelloX Biotech Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yu-Han HsiehDepartment of Strategic Technology, JelloX Biotech Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yung-An ChenDepartment of Strategic Technology, JelloX Biotech Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Margaret Dah-Tsyr ChangDepartment of Strategic Technology, JelloX Biotech Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yen-Yin LinDepartment of Strategic Technology, JelloX Biotech Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chun-Ta LiaoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chang Gung University · TWNational Tsing Hua University · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perineural invasion (PNI), a form of local invasion defined as the ability of cancer cells to invade in, around, and through nerves, has a negative prognostic impact in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Unfortunately, the diagnosis of PNI suffers from a significant degree of intra- and interobserver variability. The aim of this pilot study was to develop a deep learning-based human-enhanced tool, termed domain knowledge enhanced yield (Domain-KEY) algorithm, for identifying PNI in digital slides. Methods: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs, n = 85) were obtained from 80 patients with OCSCC. The model structure consisted of two parts to simulate human decision-making skills in diagnostic pathology. To this aim, two semantic segmentation models were constructed (i.e., identification of nerve fibers followed by the diagnosis of PNI). The inferred results were subsequently subjected to post-processing of generated decision rules for diagnostic labeling. Ten H&E-stained WSIs not previously used in the study were read and labeled by the Domain-KEY algorithm. Thereafter, labeling correctness was visually inspected by two independent pathologists. Results: The Domain-KEY algorithm was found to outperform the ResnetV2_50 classifier for the detection of PNI (diagnostic accuracy: 89.01% and 61.94%, respectively). On analyzing WSIs, the algorithm achieved a mean diagnostic accuracy as high as 97.50% Conclusions: The Domain-KEY algorithm successfully mimicked human decision-making skills and supported expert pathologists in the routine diagnosis of PNI.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdigital pathologyoral cavity squamous cell carcinomaperineural invasion

Identifiers

PMID36353548
PMCPMC9638412
OpenAlexW4307265314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.