Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353448›Full record

ArticleToxicon: X2022

Uniting behind a common goal: Collaboration between traditional healers and allopathic health care workers to improve rural snakebite care.

Jonathan Steinhorst, Frank-Leonel Tianyi, Abdulrazaq Garba Habib, George O Oluoch, David G Lalloo, Ymkje Stienstra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicon: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Jonathan SteinhorstUniversity of Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Frank-Leonel TianyiCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Abdulrazaq Garba HabibInfectious Disease and Tropical Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Health Science, Bayero University Kano, Nigeria.
George O OluochKenya Snakebite Research & Intervention Centre, Institute of Primate Research, Karen, Nairobi, Kenya.
David G LallooCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ymkje StienstraUniversity of Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLBayero University Kano · NGInstitute of Primate Research · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming is an acute medical emergency which affects hundreds of thousands of people worldwide, primarily in remote rural areas of low-and middle income countries in the Global South. A considerable proportion of snakebite patients turn to traditional healers (THs) for help, driven by a number of push and pull factors. These include socio-cultural factors, geographical proximity, and the absence or inaccessibility of overstretched and often costly allopathic healthcare services. Although traditional healers and allopathic healthcare staff share a common focus -the recovery and well-being of their patients- both systems operate largely in parallel to each other with collaborations being an exception rather than the rule. This is to the detriment of snakebite patients, who frequently find themselves being caught-up in the dualism between the two separate systems. Given the right circumstances, snakebite patients could benefit from elements of care from both modalities. Here, we have reviewed the role of THs in snakebite care and explored how their integration into the formal healthcare system could improve the implementation and outcome of care. The effective recruitment of THs to aid in disease control and treatment efforts in diseases other than snakebite underscores the potential benefits of this strategy. Carefully devised proof of concept studies are needed to test our hypothesis that collaborations between the formal healthcare sector and THs are feasible and improve outcomes in snakebite care.

Indexed as

Allopathic healthcareCollaborationHealth seekingSnakebite envenomingTraditional healersTraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID36353448
PMCPMC9637966
OpenAlexW4308033651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.