ArticleJSES international2022
Sex differences in utilization and perioperative outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do Computed Tomography Findings Affect Operating Time in Bi-Lateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy? A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sports Injuries in Female and Non-Binary Athletes: A Systematic Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Informed Consent in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Female athletes have high return to sport and low complication rates following ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) repair or reconstruction: a systematic review.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025Review
- Risk Factors for High Repair Tension During Rotator Cuff Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the volume and proportion of patients treated arthroscopically for rotator cuff repair increases, it is important to recognize sex differences in utilization and outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2010 and 2019 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, and information concerning utilization, operative time, length of hospital stay, days from operation to discharge, readmission, and adverse events were analyzed by sex. Results: Of 42,443 included patients, 57.7% were male and 42.3% were female. Comparably, females were generally older ( Conclusion: Sex differences among patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are evident, indicating the need for further research to understand and address the root causes of inequality and optimize care for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.