Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353329›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2022

Automatic detection of teeth and dental treatment patterns on dental panoramic radiographs using deep neural networks.

Hye-Ran Choi, Thomhert Suprapto Siadari, Jo-Eun Kim, Kyung-Hoe Huh, Won-Jin Yi, Sam-Sun Lee, Min-Suk Heo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Descriptive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hye-Ran ChoiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0544-0377
Thomhert Suprapto SiadariArtificial Intelligence Research Centre, Digital Dental Hub Incorporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-0953
Jo-Eun KimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0218-5304
Kyung-Hoe HuhDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8771-0392
Won-Jin YiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5977-6634
Sam-Sun LeeDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-9262
Min-Suk HeoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-0645
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University Dental Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disaster victim identification issues are especially critical and urgent after a large-scale disaster. The aim of this study was to suggest an automatic detection of natural teeth and dental treatment patterns based on dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) using deep learning to promote its applicability as human identifiers. A total of 1 638 DPRs, of which the chronological age ranged from 20 to 49 years old, were collected from January 2000 to November 2020. This dataset consisted of natural teeth, prostheses, teeth with root canal treatment, and implants. The detection of natural teeth and dental treatment patterns including the identification of teeth number was done with a pre-trained object detection network which was a convolutional neural network modified by EfficientDet-D3. The objective metrics for the average precision were 99.1% for natural teeth, 80.6% for prostheses, 81.2% for treated root canals, and 96.8% for implants, respectively. The values for the average recall were 99.6%, 84.3%, 89.2%, and 98.1%, in the same order, respectively. This study showed outstanding performance of convolutional neural network using dental panoramic radiographs in automatically identifying teeth number and detecting natural teeth, prostheses, treated root canals, and implants.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdisaster victim identificationforensic odontologyForensic sciencesindividual identificationradiography

Identifiers

PMID36353329
PMCPMC9639521
OpenAlexW4221129905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.