Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353183›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2022

Sensor-based gait training to reduce contact time for runners with exercise-related lower leg pain: a randomised controlled trial.

Alexandra F DeJong Lempke, Stephanie L Stephens, Pamela N Fish, Xavier D Thompson, Joseph M Hart, David J Hryvniak, Jordan S Rodu, Jay Hertel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04270565 (Gait-Training Using Wearable Sensors for Runners With Exercise-Related Lower Leg Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04270565 nacompletednot on this map

Gait-Training Using Wearable Sensors for Runners With Exercise-Related Lower Leg Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsShin Splint, Running-related InjuryArmsIn-Field Gait-Training, Home Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra F DeJong LempkeKinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5702-9184
Stephanie L StephensKinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Pamela N FishKidney Center, Fresenius Medical Care, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Xavier D ThompsonKinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Joseph M HartOrthopaedics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
David J HryvniakPhysical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jordan S RoduStatistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jay HertelKinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effects of a 4-week randomised controlled trial comparing an outdoor gait-training programme to reduce contact time in conjunction with home exercises (contact time gait-training feedback with home exercises (FBHE)) to home exercises (HEs) alone for runners with exercise-related lower leg pain on sensor-derived biomechanics and patient-reported outcomes. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Laboratory and field-based study. Participants: 20 runners with exercise-related lower leg pain were randomly allocated into FBHE (4 male (M), 6 female (F), 23±4 years, 22.0±4.3 kg/m Interventions: Both groups completed eight sessions of HEs over 4 weeks. The FBHE group received vibrotactile feedback through wearable sensors to reduce contact time during outdoor running. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and outdoor gait assessments were conducted for both groups at baseline and 4 weeks. PROMs were repeated at 6 weeks, and feedback retention was assessed at 6 weeks for the FBHE group. Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to assess the influence of group and timepoint on primary outcomes. Results: The FBHE group reported increased function and recovery on PROMs beyond the HE group at 6 weeks (p<0.001). There was a significant group by time interaction for Global Rating of Change (p=0.004) and contact time (p=0.002); the FBHE group reported greater subjective improvement and reduced contact time at 4 and 6 weeks compared with the HE group and compared with baseline. The FBHE group had increased cadence (mean difference: 7 steps/min, p=0.01) at 4 weeks during outdoor running compared with baseline. Conclusion: FBHE was more effective than HE alone for runners with exercise-related lower leg pain, manifested with improved PROMs, reduced contact time and increased cadence. Trial registration number: NCT04270565.

Indexed as

AccelerometerLower limb quadrant related to injuriesRunningSports medicine

Identifiers

PMID36353183
PMCPMC9639130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.