ArticleEuropean urology open science2022
Human Gut Mycobiome and Fungal Community Interaction: The Unknown Musketeer in the Chemotherapy Response Status in Bladder Cancer.
Article in European urology open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut microbiotas attributed to disorders and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer: Geographical factors, inflammation, metabolic toxic.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation: a novel strategy and challenges in the adjuvant treatment of bladder Cancer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Mycobiome: an underexplored kingdom in cancer.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- The gastrointestinal mycobiome in inflammation and cancer: unraveling fungal dysbiosis, pathogenesis, and therapeutic potential.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Microbiome landscapes of the bladder, intestine, and vagina in bladder cancer: a systematic review.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- The mycobiome in human cancer: analytical challenges, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic implications.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Metagenomics reveals unique gut mycobiome biomarkers in major depressive disorder - a non-invasive method.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Role of Fungi in Tumorigenesis: Promises and Challenges.Annual review of pathology · 2025Review
- Deciphering the urinary microbiome and urological cancers: from correlation to mechanisms and treatment.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Insights into the Interplay between the Urinary Microbiome and Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Defining the Mycobiome in Bladder Cancer.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Mechanism-guided fine-tuned microbiome potentiates anti-tumor immunity in HCC.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Fungal mycobiome-mediated immune response: a non-negligible promoter in pancreatic oncogenesis and chemoresistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Until recently, the properties of microbiome and mycobiome in humans and its relevance to disease have largely been unexplored. While the interest of microbiome and malignancy over the past few years have burgeoned with advent of new technologies, no research describing the composition of mycobiome in bladder cancer has been done. Deciphering of the metagenome and its aggregate genetic information can be used to understand the functional properties and relationships between the bacteria, fungi, and cancer. Objective: The aim of this project is to characterize the compositional range of the normal versus bladder cancer mycobiome of the gut. Design setting and participants: An internal transcribed spacer (ITS) survey of 52 fecal samples was performed to evaluate the gut mycobiome differences between noncancer controls and bladder cancer patients. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Our study evaluated the differences in mycobiome among patients with bladder cancer, versus matched controls. Our secondary analysis evaluated compositional differences in the gut as a function of response status with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Data demultiplexing and classification were performed using the QIIME v.1.1.1.1 platform. The Ion Torrent-generated fungal ITS sequence data were processed using QIIME (v.1.9.1), and the reads were demultiplexed, quality filtered, and clustered into operation taxonomic units using default parameters. Alpha and beta diversity were computed and plotted in Phyloseq, principal coordinate analysis was performed on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity indices, and a one-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences between cohorts. Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) was applied to infer functional categories associated with taxonomic composition. Results and limitations: We found distinctive mycobiome differences between control group ( Conclusions: Our study is the first to characterize the enteric mycobiome in patients with bladder cancer and describe complex ecological network alterations, indicating complex bacteria-fungi interactions, particularly highlighted among patients with complete neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Patient summary: Our study has demonstrated that the composition of stool mycobiome (fungal inhabitants of the gastrointestinal tract) in patients with bladder cancer is different from that in noncancer individuals. Furthermore, when evaluating how patients respond to chemotherapy given prior to their surgery, our study noted significant differences between patients who responded and those who did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.