ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Evaluation of chest CT-scan appearances of COVID-19 according to RSNA classification system.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment and characterization of an hFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Radiologic Society of North America (RSNA) divides patients into four sections: negative, atypical, indeterminate, and typical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia based on their computed tomography (CT) scan findings. Herein, we evaluate the frequency of the chest CT-scan appearances of COVID-19 according to each RSNA categorical group. Methods: A total of 90 patients with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled in this study and differences in age, sex, cardiac characteristics, and imaging features of lung parenchyma were evaluated in different categories of RSNA classification. Results: According to the RSNA classification 87.8, 5.56, 4.44, and 2.22% of the patients were assigned as typical, indeterminate, atypical, and negative, respectively. The proportion of "atypical" patients was higher in the patients who had mediastinal lymphadenopathy and pleural effusion. Moreover, ground-glass opacity (GGO) and consolidation were more pronounced in the lower lobes and left lung compared to the upper lobes and right lung, respectively. While small nodules were mostly seen in the atypical group, small GGO was associated with the typical group, especially when it is present in the right lung and indeterminate group. Conclusion: Regardless of its location, non-round GGO is the most prevalent finding in the typical group of the RSNA classification systems. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy, pleural effusion, and small nodules are mostly observed in the atypical group and small GGO in the right lung is mostly seen in the typical group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.