Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353010›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022

Helicopter parenting, from good intentions to poor outcomes. What parents needs to know?

Omna Shaki, Gayatri K Gupta, Prateek Yadav, Faisal A Faisal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omna ShakiDepartment of Trauma and Emergency, Base Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Gayatri K GuptaConsultant Dermatologist, Skin Diseases Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Prateek YadavDepartment of Psychiatry, Armed Forces Medical Collage, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Faisal A FaisalDepartment of Pediatrics, Base Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A single child is precious for every parent. There is an increasing demand for children to perform and to excel in all aspects of their lives. Due to increased unemployment and less job opportunities, tough competition to get admission in good school and college and to get respectable job put every parent under constant stress. These circumstances lead to parents starting micromanagement of their children. This micromanagement can be harmful to the mental and emotional wellbeing of the child, and is especially seen in single-child parents. Objective: This study aimed to ascertain if parents of single child show behavior of helicopter parenting as compared to patents having more than one child. Methods: This is an open-ended observational study, wherein 100 families with single child and 50 families with more than one child were interviewed based on self-explanatory questionnaire methods. Results: We noted that 83% parents showed behavior of helicopter parenting, especially those who have single child as compared to those having more than one child. Conclusion: Based on our survey, we can conclude that parents of single child showed behavior of helicopter parenting as compared to patents having more than one child because only child is precious and center of attraction in the families especially in Indian culture. However, large studies are required to reach a definitive conclusion.

Indexed as

Child careexcessive carehelicopter parentinglawnmower parentingoverparenting

Identifiers

PMID36353010
PMCPMC9638553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.