ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Comparison of modified McIndoe and Davydov vaginoplasty in patients with MRKH syndrome in terms of anatomical results, sexual performance and satisfaction.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome: From Radiological Diagnosis to Further Challenges-Review and Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A New Ten-Step Surgical Approach to Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome-A Preliminary Report of Three Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Davydov Vaginoplasty in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome Patient Presenting With Urethral Dilatation.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To compare the modified McIndoe versus Davydov vaginoplasty techniques in terms of anatomical results, sexual performance, and satisfaction. Methods: From September 2019 to June 2021, a comparative study was conducted on 20 patients with MRKH syndrome who underwent either McIndoe vaginoplasty (McIndoe group, 10 cases) or Davydov vaginoplasty (Davydov group, 10 cases) in a university-based tertiary care hospital (Imam Khomeini Hospital) in terms of anatomical results, sexual performance, and satisfaction. Functional results were assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Results: All surgical procedures (n = 20) were performed successfully. Patients in the modified McIndoe group were similar to those in the Davydov group in terms of hospital stay and intraoperative complications. However, postoperative complications were higher in the McIndoe group. There were no significant differences in the neovaginal length and width of the two groups at the 6-month follow-up ( Conclusions: In terms of anatomical results, sexual performance, and satisfaction, the two techniques were similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.