SynthesisJournal of cardiac surgery2022
Comparative effectiveness and safety of open triple-branched stent graft technique with stented elephant trunk implantation in treating Stanford type A aortic dissection: A trial sequential meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of cardiac surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of open triple-branched stent graft technique with stented elephant trunk implantation in treating Stanford type A aortic dissection: A trial sequential meta-analysis.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of Surgery on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Delirium in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- A case of stent-assisted balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of distal remaining aortic dissection after the ascending aorta and aortic arch replacement for acute aortic dissection.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal surgical intervention for Stanford type A aortic dissection is controversial. The aim of this trial sequential meta-analysis was to investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of open triple-branched stent graft and stent elephant trunk implantation for total aortic arch reconstruction in Sandford type A aortic dissection.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for retrieving relevant studies from inception to February 28, 2022. We evaluated 30-day mortality, procedure-related time including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aortic cross-clamp (ACC), and selective cerebral perfusion (SCP), the incidence of postoperative complications including paralysis, cerebral embolism, and acute renal failure, intensive care unit (ICU) time, and medical expenditure. Statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 5.4 and trial sequential analysis (TSA) software.
resultsSix studies involving 260 dissection cases were included eventually. Total aortic arch reconstruction with open triple-branched stent graft was comparable to the stented elephant trunk implantation in 30-day mortality, incidence of postoperative complications, ICU time, and medical expenditure, but open triple-branched stent graft was related to shorter procedure-related time including CPB (mean difference [MD] = -46.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -67.24 to -24.98, p < .001), ACC (MD = -42.82, 95% CI = -66.74 to -18.90, p < .001), and SCP (MD = -17.88, 95% CI = -33.36 to -2.39, p = .02). TSA confirmed robustness of findings.
conclusionsOur analysis suggested that total aortic arch reconstruction with open triple-branched stent graft may be an effective and simplified procedure than the stented elephant trunk implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.