Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36352772›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2023

Simultaneous Optimization of MP2RAGE T

Ayşe Sıla Dokumacı, Fraser R Aitken, Jan Sedlacik, Pip Bridgen, Raphael Tomi-Tricot, Ronald Mooiweer, Katy Vecchiato, Tom Wilkinson, Chiara Casella, Sharon Giles and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Quantitative TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Extent of piriform cortex resection in children with temporal lobe epilepsy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
    Article
  5. Simultaneous Optimization of MP2RAGE TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ayşe Sıla DokumacıBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9035-5689
Fraser R AitkenBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jan SedlacikLondon Collaborative Ultra high field System (LoCUS), London, United Kingdom.
Pip BridgenBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Raphael Tomi-TricotBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ronald MooiweerBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Katy VecchiatoLondon Collaborative Ultra high field System (LoCUS), London, United Kingdom.
Tom WilkinsonBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7915-2888
Chiara CasellaLondon Collaborative Ultra high field System (LoCUS), London, United Kingdom.
Sharon GilesBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph V HajnalBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shaihan J MalikBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8925-9032
Jonathan O'MuircheartaighLondon Collaborative Ultra high field System (LoCUS), London, United Kingdom.
David W CarmichaelBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/ K006355/1Medical Research Council MR/K006355/1Medical Research Council MR/LO11530/1Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1Wellcome Trust 206675/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe MP2RAGE sequence is typically optimized for either T

methodsUsing the extended phase graph formalism, the signal evolution of the MP2RAGE sequence was simulated incorporating T

resultsFLAWS contrast images could be obtained while maintaining >85% of the optimal UNI contrast-to-noise ratio. Using TI

conclusionFLAWS and UNI images could be obtained in a single scan with 0.65 mm isotropic resolution, providing a set of high-contrast images and full brain coverage in a clinically applicable scan time. Images with excellent anatomical detail were demonstrated over a wide age range using the optimized parameter set.

Indexed as

White MatterBrainChildGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimaging7TFLAWSMP2RAGEMRIultrahigh field

Identifiers

PMID36352772
PMCPMC10100108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.