ArticleNursing forum2022
Physical problems and fatigue level of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Nursing forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare worker fatigue during COVID-19, SARS, and MERS: a meta-analysis.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Physical problems and fatigue level of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.Nursing forum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study was conducted to examine the physical problems and fatigue levels experienced by nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodA descriptive and correlational design was used. The study data were collected in a state and a university hospital in the center of this province between September and December 2020. The population of the study included 460 nurses in these two hospitals, and the sample consisted of 377 volunteer nurses, which represented 81.95% of the population. Data collection tools included a "Personal Information Form," a "Nurses' Physical Problems Questionnaire," and the "Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS)".
resultsThe mean score of the nurses on the total CFS was 20.14 ± 6.72. The mean CFS score of nurses who worked in the university hospital compared to the score of those who worked in the state hospital and the score of those who experienced health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the score of those who did not was significantly higher (p < .05). Regarding the physical problems that the nurses experienced, the highest rate of "yes" responses was given to the question "Have you experienced sweating in PPE?" (94.2%), while the lowest rate of "yes" responses was given to the question "Have you experienced a risk of falling due to the shoe covers you wore on your feet?" (48.0%). CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The CFS scores of the nurses who said "Yes" to all physical problems evaluated in this study were found to be significantly higher (p < .05). Nurses' work-related fatigue is recognized as a threat to nurse health and patient safety. By providing adequate staffing levels to frontline nurses in the COVID-19 pandemic, nurse managers can effectively reduce or prevent pandemic fatigue and improve their physical health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.