Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36352491›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2022

Euthanasia of a person with a psychiatric disorder does not violate the European Convention on Human Rights (

M De Hert, S Loos, K Van Assche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Euthanasia for unbearable suffering caused by a psychiatric disorder: improving the regulatory framework.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M De HertDepartment of psychotic disorders, University Psychiatric Centre Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-5920
S LoosResearch Group Personal Rights and Property Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4350-3252
K Van AsscheAntwerp Health Law and Ethics Chair, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1745-0043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For more than 20 years, euthanasia in Belgium and The Netherlands is allowed for unbearable suffering caused by terminal or non-terminal illnesses, including psychiatric disorders. Although euthanasia numbers have been increasing over the years, the percentage of cases involving people with a primary psychiatric diagnosis has remained stable (between 1 and 2%). For these cases, the Belgian and Dutch Euthanasia Laws operate similar due care criteria: a well-considered, repeated, and voluntary request from a legally competent adult; a medical condition without prospect of improvement; constant and unbearable suffering that cannot be alleviated; consultation of two independent physicians, including a psychiatrist; and

Indexed as

EuthanasiaMental DisordersAdultBelgiumHuman RightsHumansNetherlandsEuthanasiaMAIDMedical ethicsMedical Law

Identifiers

PMID36352491
PMCPMC9724215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.