Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36352489›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review.

Liv Fegran, Wilma Ten Ham-Baloyi, Mariann Fossum, Olav Johannes Hovland, Joanne R Naidoo, Dalena R M van Rooyen, Ellen Sejersted, Nastasja Robstad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06855719 (Effectiveness of a Multimodal Intervention With Simulation for Learning Home Health Nursing Care of Patients With Multimorbidity and Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06855719 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Multimodal Intervention With Simulation for Learning Home Health Nursing Care of Patients With Multimorbidity and Heart Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CadizRan2025 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsMultimorbidity, Heart FailureArmsTraining in high-fidelity simulation and knowledge of care protocols in patients with multimorbidity and heart failure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liv FegranUniversity of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.
Wilma Ten Ham-BaloyiNelson Mandela University, Ocean Sciences Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2253-6354
Mariann FossumUniversity of Agder, Campus Grimstad, Grimstad, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4162-4277
Olav Johannes HovlandUniversity of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-696X
Joanne R NaidooNelson Mandela University, North Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Dalena R M van RooyenNelson Mandela University, Ocean Sciences Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
Ellen SejerstedUniversity of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.
Nastasja RobstadUniversity of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6529-0745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo map the evidence of the simulation debriefing phase in simulation activities of nursing education, to address and inform clinical teaching and learning in nursing.

designA scoping review.

methodsA systematic review of literature published between 2008-2021 was conducted using CINAHL & ERIC, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library and JBI Evidence synthesis. Inclusion criteria were primary studies published in English on simulation debriefing at all levels in nursing education.

resultsOf 140 included references, only 80% (N = 112) framed simulation debriefing theoretically either by specific theories/models or as a literature review of the topic. A variety of simulation debriefing methods were identified; however, debriefing methods were only described in 79% (N = 110) of the references. There appears to be a gap in consensus concerning the theoretical or methodological frameworks characterizing simulation debriefing in nursing education. The majority of studies (86%) were conducted at a bachelor's degree level (N = 121).

Indexed as

Education, NursingClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationLearningclinical teaching and learningnursingnursing educationscoping reviewsimulation debriefingtheoretical framework

Identifiers

PMID36352489
PMCPMC9912432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.