Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36352479›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

The Workwell trial: protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of job retention vocational rehabilitation for employed people with inflammatory arthritis.

Alison Hammond, Kathryn A Radford, Angela Ching, Yeliz Prior, Rachel O'Brien, Sarah Woodbridge, June Culley, Jennifer Parker, Paula Holland

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03942783 (A Randomised Controlled Trial of Job Retention Vocational Rehabilitation for Employed People With Inflammatory Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03942783 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Job Retention Vocational Rehabilitation for Employed People With Inflammatory Arthritis: the WORKWELL Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SalfordRan2019 to 2024Enrolled249ConditionsArthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis, Psoriatic, Arthritis, InflammatoryArmsWORKWELL, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement in Clinical Trials: A Multi-Perspective Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the ROWTATE Programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alison HammondCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Allerton, Frederick Road, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 6PU, UK. a.hammond@salford.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5266-9991
Kathryn A RadfordDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6246-3180
Angela ChingCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Allerton, Frederick Road, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 6PU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3765-2534
Yeliz PriorCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Allerton, Frederick Road, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 6PU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-6254
Rachel O'BrienCollege of Health, Well Being and Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4720-1956
Sarah WoodbridgeCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Allerton, Frederick Road, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 6PU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6843-0395
June CulleyPatient research partner, Derbyshire, UK.
Jennifer ParkerCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, University of Salford, Allerton, Frederick Road, Salford, Greater Manchester, M6 6PU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2235-5748
Paula HollandDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-9957
University of Salford · GBDerbyshire County Council · GBLancaster University · GBSheffield Hallam University · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Versus Arthritis 21761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Workwell trial is a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with the aims of evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of job retention vocational rehabilitation for employed people with inflammatory arthritis, who are experiencing work difficulties due to their arthritis. Vocational rehabilitation is delivered by health service occupational therapists, who have received additional training in providing this Workwell intervention. A process evaluation will be undertaken alongside the main trial to investigate implementation fidelity; understand key stakeholders' perspectives of the intervention and the social and structural context in which the intervention is provided; and explore issues related to future implementation in clinical practice. This protocol describes the aims, objectives, and methodology of the Workwell trial process evaluation.

methodsThis mixed methods process evaluation will follow the Medical Research Council's Guidance on process evaluations for complex interventions. It will be underpinned by the conceptual framework for implementation fidelity (CFIF) and normalisation process theory (NPT). We will analyse treatment records, work assessments, and treatment notes to ascertain implementation fidelity. Semi-structured interviews with trial participants, their employer/line managers, treating therapists, and their therapy service managers will be undertaken to explore perceptions of the intervention, contextual factors, and potential for future implementation in practice. Interview topic guides will be informed by NPT. Therapists' views about Workwell training will be explored via questionnaires following training, and interviews and focus groups following treatment delivery to inform future implementation. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. NPT will guide data analysis and interpretation. Findings from the different elements of this embedded design process evaluation will be reported separately and then the elements integrated. The process evaluation data will be analysed independently of the Workwell trial outcome evaluation. The process evaluation data will then be reviewed in the light of the trial findings. DISCUSSION: Few trials of job retention vocational rehabilitation in arthritis have included process evaluations. This process evaluation will assist in understanding factors influencing trial outcomes and identifying potential contextual barriers and facilitators for the potential implementation of Workwell vocational rehabilitation into clinical services.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03942783 . Registered on 08 May 2019. ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN61762297 . Registered on 13 May 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

ArthritisRehabilitation, VocationalCost-Benefit AnalysisFocus GroupsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicArthritisComplex interventionMixed methodsOccupational therapyProcess evaluationProtocolRandomised controlled trialVocational rehabilitationWork

Identifiers

PMID36352479
PMCPMC9645762
OpenAlexW4308627591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.