Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36352437›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2022

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study.

Jong Hyun Tae, Moon Soo Ha, Byung Hoon Chi, In Ho Chang, Tae-Hyoung Kim, Soon Chul Myung, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Myoungsuk Kim, Kyung-Eun Lee, Yuwon Kim and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jong Hyun TaeDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Moon Soo HaDepartment of Urology, Hyundae General Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Byung Hoon ChiDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In Ho ChangDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Hyoung KimDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soon Chul MyungDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tuan Thanh NguyenDepartment of Urology, Cho Ray Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi, Minh City, Vietnam.
Myoungsuk KimData Science Team, Evidnet. Co., Ltd, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Eun LeeData Science Team, Evidnet. Co., Ltd, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Yuwon KimData Science Team, Evidnet. Co., Ltd, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Ki WooData Science Team, Evidnet. Co., Ltd, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Dae-Sung KyoungData Science Team, Hanmi Pharm. Co., Ltd, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hasung KimData Science Team, Hanmi Pharm. Co., Ltd, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Se Young ChoiDepartment of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea. urosyc@cau.ac.kr.
Chung-Ang University Hospital · KRHanmi Pharmaceutical (South Korea) · KRCho Ray Hospital · VNChung-Ang University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1A2C2008207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the trend of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision (NUx) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to compare the perioperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) between AC and NAC using nationwide population-based data. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected data on patients diagnosed with UTUC and treated with NUx between 2004 and 2016 using the National Health Insurance Service database, and evaluated the overall treatment trends. The AC and NAC groups were propensity score-matched. Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess survival.

resultsOf the 8,705 enrolled patients, 6,627 underwent NUx only, 94 underwent NAC, and 1,984 underwent AC. The rate of NUx without perioperative chemotherapy increased from 70.8 to 78.2% (R

conclusionThe use of NUx without perioperative chemotherapy has tended to increase in South Korea. Dialysis, TUR-BT, and radiotherapy rates after NUx were similar between the NAC and AC groups. There was no significant difference in OS between the NAC and AC groups. Proper perioperative chemotherapy according to patient and tumor conditions should be determined by obtaining more evidence of UTUC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCohort StudiesHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesChemotherapyDrug therapyPopulationSurvivalUreteral neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36352437
PMCPMC9644507
OpenAlexW4308659445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.