Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36352374›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients' experiences obtaining a tuberculosis diagnosis in Peru: a mixed-methods study.

Ana Karina Millones, Leonid Lecca, Diana Acosta, Hortencia Campos, Erika Del Águila-Rojas, Sheyla Farroñay, Giannina Morales, Judith Ramirez-Sandoval, Isabel Torres, Judith Jimenez and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spatial and epidemiological mapping of tuberculosis on an Amazon island: effect of the COVID-19 pandemic.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Karina MillonesSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Leonid LeccaSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Diana AcostaSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Hortencia CamposSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Erika Del Águila-RojasSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Sheyla FarroñaySocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Giannina MoralesSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Judith Ramirez-SandovalSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Isabel TorresSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Judith JimenezSocios En Salud Sucursal Peru, Lima, Peru.
Courtney M YuenDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Courtney_Yuen@hms.harvard.edu.
EsSALUD · PEHarvard University · US

Funding

New approaches to optimizing the application and measuring the impact of community-based tuberculosis interventionsDP2MD015102 · NIMHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI YUEN, COURTNEY M. · 2019 to 2019
$2.4M
NIH HHS DP2MD015102NIMHD NIH HHS DP2 MD015102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted TB services worldwide, leading to diagnostic delays. There have been few published reports describing how the pandemic affected people's pathway to diagnosis from their own perspectives. We sought to evaluate the impact on the pandemic on people's experiences obtaining a TB diagnosis.

methodsWe performed a mixed-methods study, enrolling newly diagnosed TB patients from 12 health centers in Lima, Peru. We used structured surveys to quantify diagnostic delay, defined as the time between symptom onset and diagnosis, and in-depth interviews to understand the ways in which the pandemic affected the pathway to care. We compared diagnostic delay between patients enrolled during the first year of the pandemic to those diagnosed after using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We used an inductive content analysis approach to analyze interview content related to the pandemic.

resultsWe enrolled 51 patients during November 2020-April 2021 (during the first year of the pandemic) and 49 patients during October 2021-February 2022. Median diagnostic delay was longer for patients diagnosed during the first year of the pandemic (median 15 [IQR 5-26] weeks compared to 6 [IQR 3-18] weeks, p = 0.027). Qualitative analysis of 26 interviews revealed that the pandemic affected participants' care-seeking behavior and their ability to access to TB diagnostic services, particularly for those diagnosed in the first year of the pandemic. Many participants initially had their symptoms attributed to COVID-19, resulting in delayed TB evaluation and additional costs for COVID-19 treatment.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic impacted multiple steps in the pathway to care for TB patients in Lima, causing delays in TB diagnosis. These findings demonstrate how the shifting of health care resources to prioritize COVID-19 can lead to collateral damage for people with TB and other conditions.

Indexed as

COVID-19TuberculosisCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentCross-Sectional StudiesDelayed DiagnosisHumansPandemicsPeruCosts and cost analysisDelayed diagnosisSARS-CoV-2Tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36352374
PMCPMC9645304
OpenAlexW4308730724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.