Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36352216›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Machine Learning Using Gene-Sets to Infer miRNA Function.

Andrew Dhawan, Francesca M Buffa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew DhawanNeurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Francesca M BuffaMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. francesca.buffa@oncology.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

miRNA are regulators of cell phenotype, and there is clear evidence that these small posttranscriptional modifiers of gene expression are involved in defining a cellular response across states of development and disease. Classical methods for elucidating the repressive effect of a miRNA on its targets involve controlling for the many factors influencing miRNA action, and this can be achieved in cell lines, but misses tissue and organism level context which are key to a miRNA function. Also, current technology to carry out this validation is limited in both generalizability and throughput. Methodologies with greater scalability and rapidity are required to better understand the function of these important species of RNA. To this end, there is an increasing store of RNA expression level data incorporating both miRNA and mRNA, and in this chapter, we describe how to use machine learning and gene-sets to translate the knowledge of phenotype defined by mRNA to putative roles for miRNA. We outline our approach to this process and highlight how it was done for our miRNA annotation of the hallmarks of cancer using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. The concepts we present are applicable across datasets and phenotypes, and we highlight potential pitfalls and challenges that may be faced as they are used.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsNeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMachine LearningRNA, MessengerMicroRNAsRNA, MessengerExpressionGene-setGene signaturesHallmarks of cancerMachine learningmiRNAmiRNA functionmiRNA–mRNA networkRegularized regression

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.