ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
Automated Registration and Color Labeling of Serial 3D Double Inversion Recovery MR Imaging for Detection of Lesion Progression in Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hippocampal Radiomic Signatures in Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes: A Machine Learning-Based MRI Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Photopic (tint) ultrasound in musculoskeletal radiology - a pilot visual-grading/acceptability study.Journal of ultrasonography · 2026Article
- MICAFlow: Fast and robust MRI preprocessing bridging research neuroimaging and clinical practice.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated co-registration and subtraction techniques have been shown to be useful in the assessment of longitudinal changes in multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion burden, but the majority depend on T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences. We aimed to investigate the use of a novel automated temporal color complement imaging (CCI) map overlapped on 3D double inversion recovery (DIR), and to assess its diagnostic performance for detecting disease progression in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as compared to standard review of serial 3D DIR images. We developed a fully automated system that co-registers and compares baseline to follow-up 3D DIR images and outputs a pseudo-color RGB map in which red pixels indicate increased intensity values in the follow-up image (i.e., progression; new/enlarging lesion), blue-green pixels represent decreased intensity values (i.e., disappearing/shrinking lesion), and gray-scale pixels reflect unchanged intensity values. Three neuroradiologists blinded to clinical information independently reviewed each patient using standard DIR images alone and using CCI maps based on DIR images at two separate exams. Seventy-six follow-up examinations from 60 consecutive MS patients who underwent standard 3 T MR brain MS protocol that included 3D DIR were included. Median cohort age was 38.5 years, with 46 women, 59 relapsing-remitting type MS, and median follow-up interval of 250 days (interquartile range: 196-394 days). Lesion progression was detected in 67.1% of cases using CCI review versus 22.4% using standard review, with a total of 182 new or enlarged lesions using CCI review versus 28 using standard review. There was a statistically significant difference between the two methods in the rate of all progressive lesions (P < 0.001, McNemar's test) as well as cortical progressive lesions (P < 0.001). Automated CCI maps using co-registered serial 3D DIR, compared to standard review of 3D DIR alone, increased detection rate of MS lesion progression in patients undergoing clinical brain MRI exam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.