ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023
Musculoskeletal Embolotherapy.
Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-site efficacy and safety of transarterial microembolization with imipenem/cilastatin for refractory musculoskeletal pain: a single-centre analysis of hip, knee and shoulder (FIRE-NEM study).La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Imipenem/Cilastatin Sodium as Reabsorbable Embolic Agent in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Multicentric Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mastering Musculoskeletal Interventions: CVIR's Newest Special Issue.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023Article
- Commentary: Intra-arterial Injection of Temporary Embolic Material Through a Needle Inserted into the Radial or Ulnar Artery for Distal and Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study of 92 Patients.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Painful articular musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are common, debilitating and sometimes difficult to treat. Transcatheter embolisation may offer an alternative way to manage the pain associated with these conditions, but the field is still in its infancy. To date, the most commonly studied indication is knee osteoarthritis, but the technique has been trailed in multiple other tissue beds, including for adhesive capsulitis and tendinopathies. Whilst early results appear promising, the existing studies are mostly open-labelled and non-randomised; there is a need for high-quality evidence to robustly assess the procedures efficacy. In this review, we set out to evaluate the current evidence underlying the pathophysiology and mechanism of action of embolisation; discuss the technical aspects of the procedure including embolic selection, and appraise the published clinical outcomes and adverse effects. Finally, we discuss the future directions and research priorities in this rapidly developing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.