ArticleNeurosurgical review2022
Endoscopic resection of thalamic lesions via supracerebellar infratentorial approach: a case series and technical note.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic occipital transtentorial transrecess approach for resection of a challenging midbrain-thalamic cavernous malformation: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Strategy of adult thalamic glioma surgery: Thoughts and practices based on thalamic glioma classification.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Anemia and Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- Article
- An endoscopic-assisted contralateral paramedian supracerebellar infratentorial approach in the treatment of thalamic hemorrhage with hematoma extension into the brainstem: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The deep location of the thalamus and the complex neural circuits in the surrounding area make surgery extremely challenging. Feasibility and advisability of using a supracerebellar infratentorial approach (SCITA) for endoscopic resection of thalamic lesions remains to be further evaluated. Fifteen patients who underwent endoscopic resection of thalamic via SCITA from 2014 to 2021 were retrospectively collected. We analyzed preoperative tumor-related variables and surgical procedures in detail, as well as postoperative outcomes. Lesions mainly located in the posterior and/or medial part of the thalamus, and some of them expanded downward, or backward. The mean size of them was 30 × 24 mm. Five of the nine patients with preoperative hydrocephalus underwent cerebrospinal fluid shunts to relieve increased intracranial pressure. Among the 15 patients, 4 were glioblastoma, 3 were pilocytic astrocytoma, and the rest included 1 case of anaplastic astrocytoma, melanoma, polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young, rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor, inflammatory lesion, diffuse midline glioma, and cavernous hemangioma. The majority of patients (10/15) achieved gross total resection, which has become more pronounced since paramedian SCITA was used in place of the midline approach in 2020 (6/8). Three patients had unresolved or new onset of clinical symptoms after surgery, resulting in a decreased KPS score at discharge. Neuro-endoscopic techniques can ameliorate many of the shortcomings of the SCITA. With the accumulation of experience and technological progress, more deficiencies of this approach may be improved, enabling safe and effective resection of posterior and/or medial part thalamic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36352046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.