ArticleScientific reports2022
Data fusion of electronic noses and electronic tongues aids in botanical origin identification on imbalanced Codonopsis Radix samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristic Constituents of Maocangzhu and Beicangzhu Revealed Using Electronic Nose, Electronic Tongue, HS-GC-IMS, and UPLC-Orbitrap Technologies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Intelligent Sensory Systems for Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Review of Electronic Nose, Electronic Tongue, and Machine Vision Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- UHPLC-Q/TOF-MS-based differential metabolite screening and origins classification of Codonopsis Radix.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Discrimination of poisonous and medicinal plants with similar appearance (Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- Digital identification and adulteration analysis of Codonopsis Radix and Stellariae Radix based on the "digital identity" of chemical compositions.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
- Application of Data Fusion in Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Quality Assessment and Classification ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Codonopsis Radix (CR) is an edible food and traditional Chinese herb medicine in China. Various varieties of Codonopsis Radix have different tastes. To make the flavor of processed food stable, two kinds of electronic sensory devices, electronic nose and electronic tongue, were used to establish a discrimination model to identify the botanical origin of each sample. The optimal model built on the 88 batches of samples was selected from the models trained with all combination of two pretreatment methods and three classification methods. A comparison were performed on the models trained on the data collected by electronic nose and electronic tongue. The results showed that the model trained on the fused dataset outperformed the models trained separately on the electronic nose data and electronic tongue data. The two preprocessing approaches could improve the prediction performance of all classification methods. Classification and Regression Tree approach performed better than Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis and Linear Discriminant Analysis in terms of accuracy. But Classification and Regression Tree tends to assign the samples of minority class to the majority class. Meanwhile, Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis keeps a good balance between the identification requirements of all the two groups of samples. Taking all the results above, the model built using the Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis method on the fused data after z-score was used to identify the botanical origin of Codonopsis Radix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.