ArticleScientific reports2022
Establishment of a model for predicting the outcome of induced labor in full-term pregnancy based on machine learning algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- External validation of a machine learning model for delivery mode prediction after induction.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Enhancing Obstetric Decision-Making With AI: A Systematic Review of AI Models for Predicting Mode of Delivery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Predicting vaginal delivery after labor induction using machine learning: Development of a multivariable prediction model.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- [Construction of a prediction model for induction of labor based on a small sample of clinical indicator data].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024Article
- Review
- Ensemble learning for fetal ultrasound and maternal-fetal data to predict mode of delivery after labor induction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate and establish a prediction model of the outcome of induced labor based on machine learning algorithm. This was a cross-sectional design. The subjects were divided into primipara and multipara, and the risk factors for the outcomes of induced labor were assessed by multifactor logistic regression analysis. The outcome model of labor induced with oxytocin (OT) was constructed based on the four machine learning algorithms, including AdaBoost, logistic regression, naive Bayes classifier, and support vector machine. Factors, such as accuracy, recall, precision, F1 value, and receiver operating characteristic curve, were used to evaluate the prediction performance of the model, and the clinical application of the model was verified. A total of 907 participants were included in this study. Logistic regression algorithm obtained better results in both primipara and multipara groups compared to the other three models. The accuracy of the model for the prediction of "successful induction of labor" was 94.24% and 96.55%, and that of "failed induction of labor" was 65.00% and 66.67% in the primipara and the multipara groups, respectively. This study established a prediction model of OT-induced labor based on the Logistic regression algorithm, with rapid response, high accuracy, and strong extrapolation, which was critical for obstetric clinical nursing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.