Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36351683›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

How do tobacco control policies work in low-income and middle-income countries? A realist synthesis.

Pragati Bhaskar Hebbar, Vivek Dsouza, Upendra Bhojani, Nuggehalli Srinivas Prashanth, Onno Cp van Schayck, Giridhara R Babu, Gera E Nagelhout

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hosting the Tobacco Industry Supply Chain and Political Interference.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pragati Bhaskar HebbarCluster on Chronic conditions and public policies, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India pragati@iphindia.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5410-4943
Vivek DsouzaCluster on Chronic conditions and public policies, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6297-7720
Upendra BhojaniCluster on Chronic conditions and public policies, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Nuggehalli Srinivas PrashanthCluster on Health equity, Institute of Public Health Bengaluru, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0968-0826
Onno Cp van SchayckDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Giridhara R BabuEpidemiology, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Gera E NagelhoutDepartment of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Institute of Public Health Bengaluru · INMaastricht University · NLPublic Health Foundation of India · IN

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden of tobacco use is disproportionately high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is scarce theorisation on what works with respect to implementation of tobacco control policies in these settings. Given the complex nature of tobacco control policy implementation, diversity in outcomes of widely implemented policies and the defining role of the context, we conducted a realist synthesis to examine tobacco control policy implementation in LMICs.

methodsWe conducted a systematic realist literature review to test an initial programme theory developed by the research team. We searched EBSCOHost and Web of Science, containing 19 databases. We included studies on implementation of government tobacco control policies in LMICs.

resultsWe included 47 studies that described several contextual factors, mechanisms and outcomes related to implementing tobacco control policies to varying depth. Our initial programme theory identified three overarching strategies: awareness, enforcement, and review systems involved in implementation. The refined programme theory identifies the plausible mechanisms through which these strategies could work. We found 30 mechanisms that could lead to varying implementation outcomes including normalisation of smoking in public places, stigmatisation of the smoker, citizen participation in the programme, fear of public opposition, feeling of kinship among violators and the rest of the community, empowerment of authorised officials, friction among different agencies, group identity among staff, shared learning, manipulation, intimidation and feeling left out in the policy-making process.

conclusionsThe synthesis provides an overview of the interplay of several contextual factors and mechanisms leading to varied implementation outcomes in LMICs. Decision-makers and other actors may benefit from examining the role of one or more of these mechanisms in their particular contexts to improve programme implementation. Further research into specific tobacco control policies and testing particular mechanisms will help deepen our understanding of tobacco control implementation in LMICs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020191541.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth PolicyHumansNicotianaPolicy MakingPovertyControl strategiesHealth education and promotionHealth policyHealth systems evaluation

Identifiers

PMID36351683
PMCPMC9644319
OpenAlexW4308606440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.