Observational studyInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2023
Baseline Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling in Dilated Cardiomyopathy with Spontaneous Mechanical Alternans.
Observational study in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Left ventricular reverse remodelling after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: results from the EXPANDed studies.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Spontaneous mechanical alternans (MA), or pulsus alternans, has been observed in heart failure patients with hypertension or tachycardia for 150 years and is considered a sign of a poor prognosis. However, in some dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients with MA, optimal medical therapy (OMT) brings left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR), a preferable prognostic indicator. This study examined the probability of LVRR in DCM patients with spontaneous MA and whether or not LVRR can be predicted by the baseline blood pressure or heart rate. Methods We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study of newly diagnosed DCM patients from January 2017 to December 2020. Results Thirty-three newly diagnosed DCM patients were retrospectively examined. Spontaneous MA was observed during diagnostic cardiac catheterization in at least 1 of the pressure waveforms of the aorta, left ventricle, pulmonary artery, or right ventricle in 10 patients (30%) (MA-group). LVRR after OMT was achieved roughly equally in the MA group (6 of 10, 60%) and the non-MA group (12 of 23, 52%). In the MA group, those who achieved LVRR had a significantly higher baseline systolic aortic pressure (more than 120 mmHg in all 6 patients) than those who did not, although the baseline heart rate did not show a significant correlation with LVRR. In contrast, in the non-MA group, LVRR was unrelated to the baseline aortic pressure or heart rate. Conclusion The probability of LVRR in newly-diagnosed DCM patients with spontaneous MA was similar to that in those without spontaneous MA. Spontaneous MA may not necessarily be a sign of a poor prognosis if observed in patients with a preserved blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.