Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36351320›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2023

Harm perceptions of secondhand e-cigarette aerosol among youth in the United States.

Delvon T Mattingly, Osayande Agbonlahor, Jayesh Rai, Joy L Hart, Alison C McLeish, Kandi L Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Scoping Review of Theory-Based Tobacco Control Efforts for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sex Differences in E-Cigarette Use and Related Health Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Delvon T MattinglyDepartment of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: delvon@umich.edu.
Osayande AgbonlahorDepartment of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Jayesh RaiChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Joy L HartDepartment of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; American Heart Association Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science, Dallas, TX 75231, USA.
Alison C McLeishChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; American Heart Association Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science, Dallas, TX 75231, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Kandi L WalkerDepartment of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; American Heart Association Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science, Dallas, TX 75231, USA.

Funding

ConProject-006U54HL120163 · NHLBI · AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION · PI BHATNAGAR, ARUNI, ROBERTSON, ROSE MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$18.8M
Superfund Training CoreP42ES023716 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HEIN, DAVID W · 2017 to 2025
$18.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL120163NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES023716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-cigarette use among youth remains a public health concern. Although extant literature has examined the perceived harms of cigarette use and secondhand smoke, perceptions of harms associated with secondhand e-cigarette aerosol (SHA) are not well understood. Therefore, we used data from the 2020 U.S. National Youth Tobacco Survey (n = 13,292) in which participants indicated whether SHA caused no harm, little harm, some harm, or a lot of harm. We dichotomized SHA harm perceptions as harmless vs harmful. We included sociodemographics (i.e., age, sex, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, urbanicity), e-cigarette use characteristics, and SHA exposure as covariates and estimated associations between SHA harm perceptions and each covariate using adjusted logistic regression. Most youth perceived SHA as harmful (87.9 %) compared to harmless (12.1 %). Older youth (vs younger youth) had higher odds of perceiving SHA as harmless, whereas male (vs female) youth had 49 % higher odds (95 % CI: 1.29-1.72) of perceiving SHA as harmless. As the number of days of e-cigarette use in the past 30 days increased (vs non-users), odds of perceiving SHA as harmless increased. Youth exposed to SHA (vs no exposure) in the past 30 days had 35 % higher odds of perceiving SHA as harmless (95 % CI: 1.16-1.57). To conclude, youth SHA harm perceptions varied overall and by sociodemographic characteristics, e-cigarette use, and SHA exposure. Educational campaigns to inform youth of the health risks associated with e-cigarettes and SHA are needed to reduce overall nicotine intake and disparities in nicotine exposure.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentAerosolsFemaleHumansMaleNicotineUnited StatesAerosolsNicotineDisparitiesE-cigaretteHarm perceptionsSecondhand aerosolTobaccoVaping

Identifiers

PMID36351320
PMCPMC10106102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.