Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36351167›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2022

Open Force Field BespokeFit: Automating Bespoke Torsion Parametrization at Scale.

Joshua T Horton, Simon Boothroyd, Jeffrey Wagner, Joshua A Mitchell, Trevor Gokey, David L Dotson, Pavan Kumar Behara, Venkata Krishnan Ramaswamy, Mark Mackey, John D Chodera and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joshua T HortonSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon TyneNE1 7RU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8694-7200
Simon BoothroydBoothroyd Scientific Consulting Ltd., 71-75 Shelton Street, LondonWC2H 9JQ, Greater London, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey WagnerThe Open Force Field Initiative, Open Molecular Software Foundation, Davis, California95616, United States.
Joshua A MitchellThe Open Force Field Initiative, Open Molecular Software Foundation, Davis, California95616, United States.
Trevor GokeyDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California92697, United States.
David L DotsonThe Open Force Field Initiative, Open Molecular Software Foundation, Davis, California95616, United States.
Pavan Kumar BeharaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California92697, United States.
Venkata Krishnan RamaswamyCresset, New Cambridge House, Bassingbourn Road, LitlingtonSG8 0SS, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Mark MackeyCresset, New Cambridge House, Bassingbourn Road, LitlingtonSG8 0SS, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5131-7583
John D ChoderaComputational & Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York10065, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-119X
Jamshed AnwarDepartment of Chemistry, Lancaster University, LancasterLA1 4YW, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-0330
David L MobleyDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California92697, United States.
Daniel J ColeSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon TyneNE1 7RU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2933-0719

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Open data-driven infrastructure for building biomolecular force fields for predictive biophysics and drug designR01GM132386 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SHIRTS, MICHAEL R · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
Medical Research Council MR/T019654/1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of accurate transferable force fields is key to realizing the full potential of atomistic modeling in the study of biological processes such as protein-ligand binding for drug discovery. State-of-the-art transferable force fields, such as those produced by the Open Force Field Initiative, use modern software engineering and automation techniques to yield accuracy improvements. However, force field torsion parameters, which must account for many stereoelectronic and steric effects, are considered to be less transferable than other force field parameters and are therefore often targets for bespoke parametrization. Here, we present the Open Force Field QCSubmit and BespokeFit software packages that, when combined, facilitate the fitting of torsion parameters to quantum mechanical reference data at scale. We demonstrate the use of QCSubmit for simplifying the process of creating and archiving large numbers of quantum chemical calculations, by generating a dataset of 671 torsion scans for druglike fragments. We use BespokeFit to derive individual torsion parameters for each of these molecules, thereby reducing the root-mean-square error in the potential energy surface from 1.1 kcal/mol, using the original transferable force field, to 0.4 kcal/mol using the bespoke version. Furthermore, we employ the bespoke force fields to compute the relative binding free energies of a congeneric series of inhibitors of the TYK2 protein, and demonstrate further improvements in accuracy, compared to the base force field (MUE reduced from 0.56

Indexed as

ProteinsSoftwareEntropyLigandsProtein BindingLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36351167
PMCPMC9709916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.