Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36351069›Full record

Observational studyRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2022

Incidence and risk factors for postintensive care syndrome in a cohort of critically ill patients.

Julia Tejero-Aranguren, Raimundo García-Del Moral Martin, Maria Eugenia Poyatos-Aguilera, Ildaura Morales-Galindo, Angel Cobos-Vargas, Manuel Colmenero

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Posttraumatic Growth, Anxiety, Depression, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Intensive Care Unit Survivors.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Tejero-ArangurenDepartamento de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, POD Medicina Clínica y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada - Granada, Espanha.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6303-852X
Raimundo García-Del Moral MartinDepartamento de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, POD Medicina Clínica y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada - Granada, Espanha.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1194-4915
Maria Eugenia Poyatos-AguileraDepartamento de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, POD Medicina Clínica y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada - Granada, Espanha.
Ildaura Morales-GalindoDepartamento de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, POD Medicina Clínica y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada - Granada, Espanha.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-9505
Angel Cobos-VargasDepartamento de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, POD Medicina Clínica y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada - Granada, Espanha.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9431-9466
Manuel ColmeneroDepartamento de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, POD Medicina Clínica y Salud Pública, Universidad de Granada - Granada, Espanha.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5005-1154
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS · CHTexas Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the incidence of postintensive care syndrome in a cohort of critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit and to identify risk factors related to its development in the physical, cognitive and mental health areas.

methodsThis was a prospective observational cohort study developed in the intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients with intensive care unit stays equal to or longer than one week and the need for mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days, shock or delirium were included in the study. Demographic variables, reasons for admission, diagnoses, sedation, type of mechanical ventilation used, complications and length of stay were recorded. A univariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors related to postintensive care syndrome. The scales used for the assessment of the different spheres were Barthel, Pfeiffer, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Impact of Event Scale-6. The main variables of interest were postintensive care syndrome incidence overall and by domains. Risk factors were examined in each of the health domains (physical, cognitive and mental health).

resultsEighty-seven patients were included. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 16.5. The mean number of intensive care unit days was 17. The incidence of global postintensive care syndrome was 56.3% (n = 49, 95%CI 45.8 - 66.2%). The incidence of postintensive care syndrome in each of the spheres was 32.1% (physical), 11.5% (cognitive), and 36.6% (mental health).

conclusionsThe incidence of postintensive care syndrome is 56.3%. The mental health sphere is the most frequently involved. The risk factors are different depending on the area considered.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID36351069
PMCPMC9749097
OpenAlexW4308774385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.