Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36351024›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss.

Pedro Jaureguiberry, Nicolas Titeux, Martin Wiemers, Diana E Bowler, Luca Coscieme, Abigail S Golden, Carlos A Guerra, Ute Jacob, Yasuo Takahashi, Josef Settele and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 198 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
198citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
90.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

198 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 899 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence of traded bird species in key biodiversity areas.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Intensive arable farming calls for resilient wild bee restoration amid severe abundance fluctuations.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Pedro JaureguiberryInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV), CONICET and FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Casilla de Correo 495, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-7392-5157
Nicolas TiteuxUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology and Department of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06114 Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7719-7417
Martin WiemersUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology and Department of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06114 Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-3903
Diana E BowlerGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7775-1668
Luca CosciemeHot or Cool Institute, Quartiersweg 4, 10829 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4427-3628
Abigail S GoldenGraduate Program in Ecology and Evolution, and Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-6291
Carlos A GuerraGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4917-2105
Ute JacobHelmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 231, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Yasuo TakahashiInstitute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2108-11 Kamiyamaguchi, Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0115, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4960-2307
Josef SetteleUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology and Department of Conservation Biology and Social-Ecological Systems, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06114 Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8624-4983
Sandra DíazInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV), CONICET and FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Casilla de Correo 495, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-0012-4612
Zsolt MolnárCentre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, 2163 Vácrátót, Hungary.
Andy PurvisNatural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences, London SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8609-6204
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal · ARAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung · DEGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DEInstitute for Global Environmental Strategies · JPInstitute of Ecology and Botany · HUNatural History Museum · GBRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of the Philippines Los Baños · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective policies to halt biodiversity loss require knowing which anthropogenic drivers are the most important direct causes. Whereas previous knowledge has been limited in scope and rigor, here we statistically synthesize empirical comparisons of recent driver impacts found through a wide-ranging review. We show that land/sea use change has been the dominant direct driver of recent biodiversity loss worldwide. Direct exploitation of natural resources ranks second and pollution third; climate change and invasive alien species have been significantly less important than the top two drivers. The oceans, where direct exploitation and climate change dominate, have a different driver hierarchy from land and fresh water. It also varies among types of biodiversity indicators. For example, climate change is a more important driver of community composition change than of changes in species populations. Stopping global biodiversity loss requires policies and actions to tackle all the major drivers and their interactions, not some of them in isolation.

Identifiers

PMID36351024
PMCPMC9645725
OpenAlexW4308625497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.